Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: detective

Each one of these emails is a violation of the federal records act, secret or not.


21 posted on 08/22/2016 7:56:20 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lacrew
Good point...she violated the federal records act.

=====================================

Does Hillary have copies of emails the FBI recovered..... emails Hillary "said" she deleted? If she does, she is in violation of the Federal Records Act and possibly the Espionage Act. And so is her staff....and anyone at the Clinton Foundation accessing State Dept mail.

Hillary's ignorance of technology has left her swinging in the breeze. Her purported "tech-ignorance" is all an act----another lie she thinks people actually believe.

==============================================

EVEN BEFORE HER INFAMOUS UN PRESSER WHERE THE SMIRKNG HILLARY DENIED EVERYTHING---Fox has Hillary on video wherein Hillary tells an earlier tech conference in California: “I have, you know, an iPad, a mini iPad, an iPhone and a Blackberry.”

" Where are all those electronics, Hillary"?

Did Hillary delete pertinent e-mails while subject to congressional investigation?

THE NYT REPORTED 3/27/15: Clinton’s review (and erasing?) of her emails did not occur when she was secretary of state ......or even shortly after she left office.

Last October, nearly two years after she left office, the State Department sent her a letter requesting all government records, like emails, she may have possessed. In response, she provided the State Department in December with about 30,000 printed emails that she said were government records. She has said that an additional 30,000 emails were personal.

It appears Clinton still has copies of the emails she deemed public records. Attached to Mr. Kendall’s letter was one sent to him by the State Department this week.

A letter from the under secretary of state for management, Patrick F. Kennedy, said that the department understood that she wanted to keep copies of those documents.

Mr. Kennedy said that the agency had consulted with the National Archives, and that allowing her “access to the documents is in the public interest as it will promote informed discussion” as she responds to congressional and other inquiries.

33 posted on 08/22/2016 8:40:09 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: lacrew
Good point...she violated the federal records act.

=====================================

Does Hillary have copies of emails the FBI recovered..... emails Hillary "said" she deleted? If she does, she is in violation of the Federal Records Act and possibly the Espionage Act. And so is her staff....and anyone at the Clinton Foundation accessing State Dept mail.

Hillary's ignorance of technology has left her swinging in the breeze. Her purported "tech-ignorance" is all an act----another lie she thinks people actually believe.

==============================================

EVEN BEFORE HER INFAMOUS UN PRESSER WHERE THE SMIRKNG HILLARY DENIED EVERYTHING---Fox has Hillary on video wherein Hillary tells an earlier tech conference in California: “I have, you know, an iPad, a mini iPad, an iPhone and a Blackberry.”

" Where are all those electronics, Hillary"?

Did Hillary delete pertinent e-mails while subject to congressional investigation?

THE NYT REPORTED 3/27/15: Clinton’s review (and erasing?) of her emails did not occur when she was secretary of state ......or even shortly after she left office.

Last October, nearly two years after she left office, the State Department sent her a letter requesting all government records, like emails, she may have possessed. In response, she provided the State Department in December with about 30,000 printed emails that she said were government records. She has said that an additional 30,000 emails were personal.

It appears Clinton still has copies of the emails she deemed public records. Attached to Mr. Kendall’s letter was one sent to him by the State Department this week.

A letter from the under secretary of state for management, Patrick F. Kennedy, said that the department understood that she wanted to keep copies of those documents.

Mr. Kennedy said that the agency had consulted with the National Archives, and that allowing her “access to the documents is in the public interest as it will promote informed discussion” as she responds to congressional and other inquiries.

34 posted on 08/22/2016 8:41:33 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson