To: MHT
It's a little counterintuitive, but the judge did the right thing.
If there's a problem with competency, it needs to be addressed now. Otherwise it can be raised in an out of time appeal and again on habeas, and the case will be bogged down in the court system for decades.
Nail it down now, and the whole process will be finished much sooner.
8 posted on
08/18/2016 2:22:52 PM PDT by
AnAmericanMother
(Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
To: AnAmericanMother
I agree with you.
Any failure to consider ‘competency’ would tie up the conviction in knots.
Do the discovery now and the inevitable appeals will have less traction.
13 posted on
08/18/2016 2:32:10 PM PDT by
Little Ray
(Freedom Before Security!)
To: AnAmericanMother
I agree. Also, if the judge accepts the guilty plea, and he later claims coercion it’s back to square one. He certainly can’t claim coercion on a not-guilty. The judge seems to be buying insurance on the eventual verdict by outmaneuvering his counsel.
21 posted on
08/18/2016 3:08:23 PM PDT by
blueplum
((March 11, 2016 - the day the First Amendment died?))
To: AnAmericanMother
Yes. Dot every “I” and cross every “T”.
35 posted on
08/18/2016 6:22:25 PM PDT by
Dogbert41
(All the days of my life were written in your book before there was one of them!)
To: AnAmericanMother
Competency? He was certainly competent enough to ask his victim if she was going to convert to Islam and when she said no, he did that which Islam commands---killed her with a sword. His victim was a Christian martyr and died for the faith. She was stronger in her conviction than St. Peter was on the night of the Cruxifiction.
Sure hope the Judge was right and he gets his...for murder and NOT "workplace violence."
37 posted on
08/18/2016 8:26:04 PM PDT by
MHT
(,`)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson