Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion; bert
The problem for me is that both of you are assuming that your sources is honest. This is a guy who asked his friends to post bail for him with the assurance that he would show up and not become a fugitive. He told the court the same thing. He lied to both of them and became a fugitive. Now, he's apparently joined forces with Russias's old KGB agent, Putin, who is a homicidal maniac who has looted his own country.

Your sources are dishonest and untrustworthy. I want no part of people like that. I'll never be that desperate.

57 posted on 08/14/2016 6:51:41 AM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Tau Food

The proof of the pudding is in the eating

He is providing a feast for all of us to partake


58 posted on 08/14/2016 8:26:29 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... We Frack for Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Tau Food

The problem for me is that you assume you know who “your (my) sources” are. I believe I simply asked you a question, which you failed to answer.

“Apparently joined forces with Russia’s old KGB agent, Putin...”

What are your sources for this “apparent” statement? The FBI? Good heavens, if you’re trusting the FBI you’re a fine one to be talking about wanting “no part of people like that (dishonest and untrustworthy)” - which shows you just don’t get it. You don’t see the government lawlessness that is blatant at this point, and not just because of what Assange says or doesn’t say but because of a whole litany of stories over the past 8 years that all support the same things that Assange’s DOCUMENTS also show.

How do you know what Assange told the people who posted bail for him? Are you one of them? Keep in mind that hacking and covert operations are never what they appear up-front. You have no idea what was said behind closed doors.

From the sources I’ve read it looks like Assange was guilty of not wearing a condom. Bear in mind that the government could charge ANY person with a crime at any time, because we don’t even know all the laws we’re supposed to be responsible for keeping. That’s part of what he’s saying with this, and it rings true with everything I’ve seen myself. Yesterday I replaced an air conditioner belt in my van; could I be charged with doing mechanics without a license? I burned trash two days ago; could I be found guilty of EPA regulations? Did I need a building permit to repair the caved-in walls of my 80-year-old root cellar?

Assange gave his testimony; it’s he-said-she-said with the only real issue being whether she was fully asleep or only half-asleep when he penetrated the woman (who was upset just hours before because he went to sleep instead of comleting intercourse with her) and the authorities dropped charges. How is a court going to decide whether she was half-asleep or fully asleep? When there’s no way to know one way or another, a jury and/or judge is ripe for “persuasion” by those who have a lot of money to offer those who make the preferred choice. And Assange is exposing just how that system operates. We’d be a fool to refuse to hear what the dems’ OWN COMMUNICATIONS admit.


61 posted on 08/14/2016 1:29:18 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson