Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCrory to take Voter ID fight to Supreme Court
WNCN.com ^ | 8/10/2016

Posted on 08/10/2016 5:26:33 AM PDT by Elderberry

WILMINGTON, N.C. (WNCN/WBTV) – Gov. Pat McCrory said he will ask the Supreme Court to weigh in on the voter ID law Wednesday.

McCrory made the announcement during Donald Trump’s rally in Wilmington Tuesday afternoon.

“There are thirty other states in the United States…over thirty other states…that know common sense shows you show an ID when you vote,” McCrory told the crowd. “Right? One person, one vote. That should be our rules.”

The request comes after an appeals court decided it won’t delay enforcement of its ruling striking down the state’s photo identification requirement and other election restrictions, including reducing early in-person voting by seven days.

Last week, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the stay after state leaders’ attorneys requested that the ruling be set aside as they ask the U.S. Supreme Court to consider the case.

A 4th Circuit panel had determined a 2013 law Republicans approved amounted to intentional discrimination of black voters.

Last week’s order says the harm to disenfranchised voters outweighs granting a delay. Last week’s injunction means no voter ID mandate and 17 days of early voting with same-day registration.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: mccrory; photoid

1 posted on 08/10/2016 5:26:33 AM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Elderberry
One person, one vote.

I would add, "One LIVE person, one vote."

2 posted on 08/10/2016 5:29:26 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Go, Gov. Pat!


3 posted on 08/10/2016 5:34:08 AM PDT by jimfree (In November 2016 my 16 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
One live non-felon (or felon with voting rights restored) citizen, one-vote.
4 posted on 08/10/2016 5:44:50 AM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

One live American Citizen, one vote.


5 posted on 08/10/2016 5:45:26 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Not a smart move. In their current configuration either they will deadlock, or Anthony Kennedy will pull another of his patented flip-flops and screw voter ID for the rest of history.


6 posted on 08/10/2016 5:45:27 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

Heard him speak at a Trump rally in NC last month. He reminded people where the exits were AND the ‘restrooms’. LOL


7 posted on 08/10/2016 5:49:18 AM PDT by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken; Little Ray

I stand corrected, and the corrections are necessary in these degenerate times.


8 posted on 08/10/2016 5:50:33 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry
...A 4th Circuit panel had determined a 2013 law Republicans approved amounted to intentional discrimination of black voters...

Blacks just can't live up to the white man's standards, according to the libs.
9 posted on 08/10/2016 5:51:22 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (There is no distinctly American criminal class - except Congress. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Nothing like making a bad situation worse... taking something to a SCOTUS packed with liefetime appointed liberal hacks makes things worse.


10 posted on 08/10/2016 5:57:17 AM PDT by GregoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The Supreme Kangaroo Court.


11 posted on 08/10/2016 6:10:43 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

This makes me wonder how it is not possible to get a photo ID, just how dumb do you have to be not to get one? Looks like the Dems will stoop to anything to win, even out right theft and murder. This country is done.


12 posted on 08/10/2016 6:16:28 AM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Foundahardheadedwoman

If SCOTUS agrees that proper identification is not a requirement to cast a ballot, this election is over.

We can overcome media bias, but we cannot overcome voter fraud.


13 posted on 08/10/2016 6:28:58 AM PDT by AFret.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Good for Pat.


14 posted on 08/10/2016 7:13:09 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Stop college/university admissions of all Black students, and throw out the ones already enrolled.

If they’re too stupid/incompetent to obtain a personal ID, then they shouldn’t be in an institution of higher learning.

That should shake-up the ACC.


15 posted on 08/10/2016 7:41:19 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I think to get a stay it goes to the scotus Judge designated for that region


16 posted on 08/10/2016 8:27:56 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Go McCrory! I just sent another contribution.


17 posted on 08/10/2016 8:36:31 AM PDT by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

It’s not so much the id’s as all the other changes. From the ruling:

“Before enacting that law, the legislature requested data on the use, by race, of a number of voting practices. Upon receipt of the race data, the General Assembly enacted legislation that restricted voting and registration in five different ways, all of which disproportionately affected African Americans,” Motz wrote.

The circuit court found that the law harmed African American participation, but did little to combat fraud, the stated purpose. Notably, the state had failed to identify even a single individual who has ever been charged with committing in-person voter fraud in North Carolina. On the other, the General Assembly did have evidence of alleged cases of mail- in absentee voter fraud. The General Assembly then exempted absentee voting from the photo ID requirement.


18 posted on 08/10/2016 9:31:06 AM PDT by oincobx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson