Posted on 08/09/2016 2:24:55 PM PDT by euram
Its called the power of unification 2nd Amendment people have amazing spirit and are tremendously unified, which gives them great political power. And this year, they will be voting in record numbers, and it wont be for Hillary Clinton, it will be for Donald Trump. - Jason Miller, Senior Communications Advisor
They need to gin this up to get Mateen father off todays topic.
Liberal media bias has long been an open secret. But now its so bad that even a liberal mainstream newspaper notes that, in an effort to destroy Donald Trump, the media have jumped the shark.
Clinton vs. Trump? No, Its the Media vs. America
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/23800-clinton-vs-trump-no-it-s-the-media-vs-america
.@RealDonaldTrump is right. If @HillaryClinton gets to pick her anti-#2A #SCOTUS judges, theres nothing we can do. #NeverHillary— NRA (@NRA) August 9, 2016
The media never even reported on Mateen being at the Clinton rally..didnt even see it on Fox News(Unless I missed it) so for all the people saying that this 2nd Amendment statement prevents the media from covering Mateen PLEASE they were NEVER going to cover it anyway
Agreed. But I wish Trump didn't aid and abet the dishonest DNC press. He shouldn't have said that.
Damn straight.
Stop expecting the media to be on our side, they are not. F ‘em.
How long before the local reporter in FL is demoted for noticing this?
Media was NEVER on our side..their agenda is to elect Democrats..PERIOD..what Trump should have been mentioning ALL DAY TODAY is Mateen being at Clintons rally..we have PLENTY of time to talk about the 2nd Amendment..what needed to be discussed today was a TERRORIST being at Clintons rally
And he shouldn’t have thrown that baby out of the meeting, and.....
You got to understand that the Clinton campaign/Media will invent anything to keep Clinton’s scandals hidden.
I think there is something we can do. We can challenge the Supreme Court for overstepping their limits. They are to protect and defend the Constitution which is very EXPLICIT about 2nd Amendment rights. “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” is CLEAR even to dummies.
The old msn is GREAT for taking things way out of context.
Got to remember that this being August, folks are still away on vacation, got the olympics distraction, and that folks pretty much do not pay any attention to politics until after Labor Day.
That’s what I understood from the moment I read his statement. He was talking about 2nd Amendment voters exercising their right to vote to protect the 2nd Amendment. Nothing more, nothing less, nothing sinister.
The fox five twisted around the 2nd comments and they did report on Mateen.
I saw the story this morning and posted it on Facebook. Only one person has commented on it so far. The Five had it on and we’re complaining that Donald Trump Just had to go make a new controversy instead of talking about Mateen sitting behind Hillary. They said he can’t quit making unforced errors.
The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is not for a voting bloc. It’s to oppose tyranny.
Agree. Just turned off the 5 as they are full fledged minus Kim g about insinuated assassination of hilly. They never used, when I watched, those words but the stretch was enough for me to say no more you are off my watch list
They had it up on the website today. I see it is gone now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.