Skip to comments.
Should Execution of Iranian Nuclear Scientist Disqualify Clinton to be Our Next President?
Townhall.com ^
| August 9, 2016
| Fres Fleitz
Posted on 08/09/2016 1:26:55 PM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
The fact alone, that she believes she is entitled to the presidency disqualifies her already.
1
posted on
08/09/2016 1:26:55 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
It’s hard to be President when living in an 8X8 cell awaiting your execution for espionage. (if we lived in a lawful nation)
2
posted on
08/09/2016 1:29:54 PM PDT
by
cyclotic
To: Kaslin
3
posted on
08/09/2016 1:30:41 PM PDT
by
Honorary Serb
(Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
To: Kaslin
"Clinton and her staff were aware that the use of iPhones and iPads by a Secretary of State for official business even in the United States was a violation of the Departments information security rules because these devices are too vulnerable to hackers. Judicial Watch reported in March 2015 that the State Departments Office of Technology Security refused several requests by Clintons staff to lift these rules so Clinton could use her personal iPhone and iPad for official unclassified email. Despite these refusals, Clinton used these devices anyway, including when traveling outside the United States." Lock her up!
4
posted on
08/09/2016 1:32:32 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: Kaslin
It should, but it won’t — she’s a Democrat. Different standard ya know.
5
posted on
08/09/2016 1:33:02 PM PDT
by
falcon99
To: Kaslin
She should have been in a prison cell decades ago.
6
posted on
08/09/2016 1:34:57 PM PDT
by
ColdOne
(poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~)
To: Kaslin
Just have to wonder what juicy information the Clintons and Obama had on Comey that resulted in his dereliction of duty.Wonder if Comey sleeps well at night knowing that his action will allow this inherently dishonest, corrupt, sloppy careless woman to become President. Comey is one miserable person.
7
posted on
08/09/2016 1:39:21 PM PDT
by
allendale
To: Kaslin
Why is Fres Fleitz wasting his time on asking such a dopey question? What universe does he think he lives in? A universe with justice?
8
posted on
08/09/2016 1:39:23 PM PDT
by
bkopto
To: Kaslin
She’s got blood on her hands.
YES!
9
posted on
08/09/2016 1:42:08 PM PDT
by
ncpatriot
To: bkopto
Sorry, that’s a typo. It’s Fred, not Fres
10
posted on
08/09/2016 1:43:41 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
(He neededAwesomeOf the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
To: bkopto
It’s a universe where people can choose what relationship they want with the Just One. There will be justice off earth if there is not on earth, but it’s up to them to pick.
11
posted on
08/09/2016 1:44:39 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: Jim Robinson
12
posted on
08/09/2016 1:44:47 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
(He neededAwesomeOf the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
To: Kaslin
In a sane world, yes. But, fortunately for Frau Blucher, if this world had a mame it would be Abby something.
13
posted on
08/09/2016 1:45:57 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Kaslin
Just add this “latest death” to the lengthening list of disqualifiers.
14
posted on
08/09/2016 1:46:13 PM PDT
by
glennaro
To: ncpatriot
There are many examples that she does.
15
posted on
08/09/2016 1:47:05 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
(He neededAwesomeOf the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
To: Kaslin
At this point, what difference does it make?
To: ncpatriot
loose lips sink ships.
she had no control of her information.
open for the world to see
as a result, some data got out
and an important man got whacked.
How can she possibly be contemplated as being responsible for America????
17
posted on
08/09/2016 1:54:25 PM PDT
by
himno hero
(hadnuff)
To: Kaslin
I would like to see a definitive timeline for this; when were the emails discussing the Iranian scientist exchanged, when was he outed and executed, and when were the emails made public? The article does not make the timeline clear.
18
posted on
08/09/2016 2:03:51 PM PDT
by
henkster
To: Kaslin
It’s not just the execution, it’s also the loss of this guy as an asset.
And...likewise, this will play out again and again, hundred different times and ways that we will never hear about nor will the connection be put together outside those truly in the know.
19
posted on
08/09/2016 2:04:48 PM PDT
by
Fitzy_888
("ownership society")
To: falcon99
The Washington Post has already come to her defense and said there is nothing to see here. According to them it’s just another right wing conspiracy gone viral. We are told to move on...
20
posted on
08/09/2016 2:22:38 PM PDT
by
Russ
(Repeal the '17th amendment.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson