what I recall is that Comey laid out the evidence in considerable detail proving her guilt. He then followed orders and announced there would be no criminal referral.
In later testimony he directly and unequivocally testified Hillary lied.
Comey is the Obama/DNC scape goat burdened with the task of removing the chance of indictment. Although he did just that, his other actions indicate to me he is following his orders while clearly indicating there are grounds for prosecution
The question becomes, if he retains his position when trump is president, will he issue the referral to the new Attorney General?
Then there is the whole question of the Clinton Foundation. Why worry about E mails when the larger crime is the Foundation for which a mountain of damning evidence exists in hand?
Just because it’s over, doesn’t mean it’s over
(apology to Yogi)
Comey:
“To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person engaged in this activity would face no consequences.
To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions but that’s not what we are deciding here.”
BUT NOT HILLARY