Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'War at Sea': Chinese Defense Chief Calls on Country to Be Ready for Combat
SputnikNews.com ^ | 4AUG2016 | Staff Writer

Posted on 08/06/2016 9:29:49 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine

In a sign of growing escalation, China’s Defense Ministry has called on the country’s military, police and general population to be ready to defend territorial claims in the South China Sea.

In the wake of the Hague-based Court of Arbitration’s decision to deny Beijing’s nine-dash-line territorial claims, tensions in the South China Sea have increased. The United States claims it will continue aggressive military action in the waterway, a move sternly opposed by China.

During a tour of military installations in the coastal Zhejiang Province, China’s Defense Minister Chang Wanquan appeared to raise the bar, calling for "recognition of the seriousness of the national security situation, especially the threat from the sea."

He also called for preparations for a "people’s war at sea," according to state-run Xinhua news agency.

Chang’s statements reiterate similar claims made by Chinese officials recently. Earlier this week, one military official speaking on condition of anonymity said that, "We should go in and give them a bloody nose."

"The People’s Liberation Army is ready," he added.

A separate source with ties to Chinese leadership described the PLA as combative.

"The United States will do what it has to do. We will do what we have to do," he said. "The entire military side has been hardened. It was a huge loss of face."

A highly-disputed region through which roughly $5 trillion in international trade passes annually, most of the South China Sea is claimed by China, though there are overlapping claims by Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, Vietnam, and the Philippines.

While the Court of Arbitration ruled against China’s claims, Beijing does not recognize the decision as legitimate.

The US and its Pacific allies have expressed opposition to China’s construction of a series of artificial islands, claiming Beijing is attempting to establish an air defense zone. China maintains it has every right to build within its own territory and that the islands will be used primarily for civilian purposes.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 08/06/2016 9:29:49 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
one (Chinese) military official speaking on condition of anonymity said that, "We should go in and give them a bloody nose."

My late father, a Detroit Golden Gloves champion, knew something about that subject. I'm sure the talent was passed down! Dad's nickname: "Shorty" would make a great sign for the training facilty: SHORTY'S GYM.

2 posted on 08/06/2016 9:47:34 PM PDT by Ace's Dad (Happiness is command of a battery of ballistic missile interceptors! DTOM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ace's Dad

I watched with glee as the US archery team defeated the Chinese archery team at the olympics. Here’s some friendly advice for the Chinese. Don’t let your water buffalo mouths overload your egg roll asses. Your fleet will quickly be converted to a junk fleet. Yeah, you’ll get that sinking feeling.


3 posted on 08/06/2016 9:55:18 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Hey China, don’t be stupid.

If Hillary gets in, you win. Just have to toss her some more cash.

If Trump gets in, you don’t want this fight.

So just chill for a few months.


4 posted on 08/06/2016 9:55:30 PM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
"A highly-disputed region through which roughly $5 trillion in international trade passes annually"

We were real smart to dump off all that manufacturing capacity to "cheap labor" countries like China. /s

5 posted on 08/06/2016 9:59:19 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Dear China:

War at sea does not guarantee Victory at sea. Just sayin'

6 posted on 08/06/2016 9:59:41 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
"The United States claims it will continue aggressive military action in the waterway, a move sternly opposed by China."

Translation: Go suck a lemon.

7 posted on 08/06/2016 10:01:15 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

It would be a huge mistake to underestimate the military capabilities of the Chinese. Their modern stealthy shore to ship missiles ( fitted with encrypted American guidance systems courtesy of President Clinton) are a very credible threat wherever they are deployed. Simply would not want American capital ships, despite their impressive defensive armament, to be within their range if shooting for some ungodly reason were to actually start. It was the deployment of those missiles in force on the shores of the Persian Gulf, that made the position of the big blue water ships of the US Navy in the shallow, narrow Gulf untenable.


8 posted on 08/06/2016 10:02:58 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
"Earlier this week, one military official speaking on condition of anonymity said that, "We should go in and give them a bloody nose."

Yeah, we remember when you went into Viet Nam to "teach them a lesson." China lost face. In fact, China lost a whole LOT of faces. Bumbling buffoons.

9 posted on 08/06/2016 10:03:31 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

blah, blah, blah, jingoism, blah, blah, blah...


10 posted on 08/06/2016 10:07:26 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (CAIR should be designated a terrorist organization. Muhammad was a Pedophile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Why would anyone (except a communist stooge) end an article saying China claims the islands will be mainly for civilian use, when everyone has seen photos of these things with every inch devoted to military aircraft and artillery?


11 posted on 08/06/2016 10:15:53 PM PDT by Williams (Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

I agree about the damage China could inflict on our expensive naval assets during standoff “misunderstanding” in the South China sea.

In addition, in China’s eyes, now may be the best time to bloody America’s nose since our Commander-in-Chief is the weakest and most ineffective that we’ve ever had since Carter.
We’ve even stated that we’d never launch a first strike nuclear attack, and judging by our middle east and Ukraine red line walk backs, our counter strike resolve and strength is in doubt as well.

RE: “It would be a huge mistake to underestimate the military capabilities of the Chinese. Their modern stealthy shore to ship missiles ( fitted with encrypted American guidance systems courtesy of President Clinton) are a very credible threat wherever they are deployed. Simply would not want American capital ships, despite their impressive defensive armament, to be within their range if shooting for some ungodly reason were to actually start. It was the deployment of those missiles in force on the shores of the Persian Gulf, that made the position of the big blue water ships of the US Navy in the shallow, narrow Gulf untenable.”


12 posted on 08/06/2016 10:20:52 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: allendale
It would be a huge mistake to underestimate the military capabilities of the Chinese.

Maybe, but if they sink any of our surface ships, we are in a state of war. Then our subs sink their entire navy in a few short weeks. They have no credible threat against our subs and we would probably go ahead and sink their bogus subs just for target practice.
13 posted on 08/06/2016 10:30:58 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: allendale
"( fitted with encrypted American guidance systems courtesy of President Clinton)"

Another real smart move. /s

Why is that SOB traitor still walking around free?

And how can anyone seriously entertain the incredibly stupid idea of allowing this corrupt America-hating treasonous crime family back into the WH?

14 posted on 08/06/2016 10:38:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Maybe they are saying that they will be the ones who will be controlling civilian commerce/shipping from now on.


15 posted on 08/06/2016 11:08:32 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: microgood

“They have no credible threat against our subs and we would probably go ahead and sink their bogus subs just for target practice.”

This isn’t “Communist” China anymore...

This is the China with all of our former manufacturing, and several hundred million in excess population.

Cut off Chinese goods due to a short fight with China from the American Markets, and what manufacturing is left here grinds to a halt in less than 30 days.

Most people have no idea how entirely dependent we have become on not just finished goods, but parts and supplies from China. Even Wheat grown in America gets shipped to China, processed into gluten, and shipped back across the pacific to be processed into all kinds of products, because things like Government environmental regulations, taxes, and Civil Liability laws have made it cheaper by a significant factor to do so.


16 posted on 08/06/2016 11:35:41 PM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

“Maybe they are saying that they will be the ones who will be controlling civilian commerce/shipping from now on.”

1/3rd of the world’s commerce already moves on Chinese-owned ships...


17 posted on 08/06/2016 11:37:46 PM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
This is the China with all of our former manufacturing, and several hundred million in excess population.

And all of it on the coast of China and well within range of the nearest Ohio-class SSBN and all 24 of her D5 missiles. Let her empty her silos and China becomes a memory. And the Chinese know this.

18 posted on 08/07/2016 3:47:48 AM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
The American people wanted "Hope and Change."

You got it.


19 posted on 08/07/2016 4:21:35 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Not with the little islamist as CIC.


20 posted on 08/07/2016 6:15:21 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson