Posted on 08/06/2016 1:39:45 PM PDT by Innovative
In a new economic blueprint that is set to unveil next week, Donald Trump will propose one of the biggest tax cuts since Ronald Reagan’s presidency, an advisor to the Republican Presidential nominee told Bloomberg.
The proposal will reiterate Trump’s plan to cut the corporate tax rate to 15%, Stephen Moore, who is the chief economist for the Heritage Foundation, and of one of the men on Trump’s 13-member economic advisory team that the Republican presidential candidate announced Friday, said.
(Excerpt) Read more at fortune.com ...
It should not be hard to decide for whom we should vote -- along with all the other big differences between the two candidates.
But liberal voters WANT to pay taxes. Remember a few days ago Hitlery said in her speech she plans to raise taxes by $1.3 trillion and everyone in the audience cheered? “Yippeeee! Giving 1/3rd of what I make to the government so they can give it to terror sponsoring countries is SOOOOO awesome!”
The talking point for tomorrow will be along the lines of “How will he PAY for it!”.
Clintoon’s head just exploded! Quick! Somebody get a bottle of Scotch!
One answer:
Cut all the BS out of the federal government....
I hope Trump is wary of Stephen Moore, he is in favor of cheap labor importation.
The tax cuts are a BIG WINNER!
Republicans in congress will insist on “pay-fors”. These tax cuts while terrific and classy, will enlarge the deficit enormously.
He’ll create private sector jobs and eliminate government excess trash....
He needs to promote this
Not if he leans government down...Which it badly needs....
“How will he PAY for it!” By saying to a bunch of fed supposed-workers “you’re fired!”, then closing down/eliminating some of the alphabet agencies they worked for...
Remember...Trump is NOT a “professional politician”.....
Looking forward to this unveiling next week and watching libs heads explode.
Trump needs something quick and catchy, to explain the basic concept of his tax plan for the public. The best example I can think of is Herman Cain’s “999” plan. He didn’t last long as a candidate, but his taxation plan did get a lot of air time. It was both catchy and fiscally sound. Cain’s lack of existing foreign policy helped to do him in. Plus, of course Ginger White, who seems to have disappeared ever since then.
Proposing tax cuts are all well and good. But you’d better have spending cuts to go along with them.
>>Although he did not specify a timeline, Trump has managed to whittle down the cost in terms of lost tax revenue by about two-thirds, to $3 trillion, Moore said.<<
“Lost tax revenue” is a nonsensical term; one having meaning only to the court jesters in Versailles on the Potomac. Reducing taxes is NOT a cost to government. It has been proven time and again that reducing taxes results in economic growth.
There’s a first time for everything.
Bingo!!
Estimates for tax fraud losses are 70 to 100 billion.
Welfare and SNAP slashing (except for the SICK and ELDERLY) could save another 50 billion.
Deciding what REALLY constitutes mental illness for SSDI could probably save 50 billion. I was in psych ward after brain injury for depression a few weeks and EVERY person in there needed SS and SNAP, the average person going to a shrink, not so much.
There’s plenty to cut.
BTW, there isn’t a deep enough depression in the WORLD that would make me go to a psych ward again!!!! Poor people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.