Posted on 08/03/2016 8:40:26 PM PDT by GilGil
Lets first discuss the obvious. How can CTH predict, weeks in advance, what Fox News Polling will present to their audience? Common sense would tell you it should be impossible to predict weeks and months in advance. After all, polls should be entirely random, based on current events.
d9d51-mouse-mission-impossibleIf media polling was truly scientific, and not manipulated by the corporate media entities producing them, we couldnt accurately predict. But theyre not, and we can.
Actually, the entire reason we deliver these predictions to you is because theres no other good or reasonable way to show people they are being gaslighted by professional MSM deceivers.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Need more Cow-Bell and less Chin.
WTF..........?
This Sundance guy is very sharp!
He sure is!
Three Gay Couples and a Senator walk into a Bar...
Three Gay Couples and a Senator walk into a Bar...
____________________
It’s a queer sort of story!
Yep Cruz is no good.
Yep Cruz is no good.
__________________
They don’t call him lyin’ Ted for nothing.
Hmmm...
Anyway, anyone could predict after a week of the media editing the RNC and a week of it editing the DNC that Hillary would see a bounce.
Add a week of it editing a dispute between an immigration lawyer and Trump on immigration for good measure...
I did not see the Green Party listed in the poll. She is taking a lot away from Hillary. I did see the Libitarian Party listed.
Acutally, it’s called the “wholly owned subsidiary of Goldman Sachs” party.
None of this weeks major polls were of likely voters, just registered voters.
At this stage of the game is should be the latter.
TEXAN looks mighty pleased with himself
The last democrat to run against a republican before Obama was Al Gore and he got slightly more than 50 million votes.
Judging from the rally turnouts for Hillary there is quite an enthusiasm gap. Obama got 69 million in 2008 and 66 million in 2012 and that was with democrats fired up.
Could Hillary barely crest 60 million or less? Given the pissed off Bernie supporters and cross over of democrat voters that is very likely.
If Sundance’ projection of 73 million for Trump is correct, Hillary will get crushed!
TEXAN looks mighty pleased with himself
________________
Even before all the controversy with Cruz started when I saw the Goldman Sachs connection I knew Cruz was no good. The man is a weasel and a lyin’ Ted.
Obama got 69 million in 2008 and 66 million in 2012. Look at what that drop in voters cost him in the 11 Battleground states...he lost %’s in each state. Using your 60 million number for Hillary, she would lose almost every one of the 11 states.
Ad the 73 million for Trump, and the hell with what the polls say, she WILL get crushed.
I am now so disgusted with him I don't know what else to say.
I myself and many truly conservative Texans were played for suckers big time.
HE shall NEVER receive any support from me ever again.
Believe me when I say I speak for other Texans also!
You Are Dead To Me Ted!
Re polls - I remember so well the night of the Reagan election. ALL the polls - and Dan Rather - said the vote was going to be 2 to 1 against Reagan..
they were half right - LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.