Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bryan999
Oh, I think it's crystal clear why they removed that word

It's not crystal clear to me.

The word furthers their propaganda. Why would they delete it? Are they trying to be less deceiving?

4 posted on 08/03/2016 3:52:32 AM PDT by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jess Kitting

I have to agree, I don’t understand why that word is so important. Please explain.


5 posted on 08/03/2016 3:59:10 AM PDT by Cyclone59 (Where are we going, and what's with the handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jess Kitting

I am pretty sure they deleted it because of a lawyer that demanded they do so who was representing the victim. The fact that they did it means they feel there might be some culpability.


7 posted on 08/03/2016 4:03:39 AM PDT by RummyChick ("...Americans think Trump is running 2 help America &Hillary is running 2 help Hillary" ~Ben Shapiro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jess Kitting

They’re covering their butts over at NBC because it is NOT discredited.

It is, in fact, very credited. And credible.

If Hillary gets called on it, and has to answer to it, and, indeed, has to lie about it, NBC looks stupid.

But beyond that, I went to Breitbart and apparently it’s also because Broaddrick’s lawyer threatened to sue:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/08/02/exclusive-nbc-quietly-scrubs-discredited-smear-clinton-rape-accuser/

“After receiving the legal letter, penned by Broaddrick’s attorney and son, Kevin L. Hickey, NBC removed the word “discredited” from the network’s Internet version of Mitchell’s video report, Broaddrick and Hickey told this reporter. However, NBC did not make any indication of the edit in the video or on the webpage that hosts it.”


8 posted on 08/03/2016 4:22:23 AM PDT by bryan999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jess Kitting
The word was deleted because Broaderick threatened to sue for defamation. Mitchell's "discredited" was a reversal for Mitchell even! Quietly dealt with, the press does not want this to become a news item.

The press also quickly dismisses as "discredited" any suggestion that the Hawaii BC Obama offered was not authentic.

11 posted on 08/03/2016 4:32:26 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson