Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arm_Bears

Ironically, on the subject of wives, if I recall correctly it was Cruz who first threw shade at Melania which, of course, guaranteed a response from The Donald.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Of course Cruz didn’t say anything about Melania himself. It was a PAC, which supposedly has no communication with the candidate.

That Soros-McCain-Feingold type of garbage begs the question: how can a candidate be sure that a PAC will campaign for him/her and not go completely off the rails, without some sort of collusion? Simple. There is collusion, and the PACs say what the candidates want them to say even if they don’t have the “I’m Candidate X and I approved this message” line in their ads.


26 posted on 07/21/2016 3:17:44 PM PDT by angryoldfatman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: angryoldfatman

No matter what - when we get to this stage, personal MUST be put aside for the sake of the election, for repudiating Hillary. That’s the ONLY thing that matters. Your widdle feelings, not so much.


29 posted on 07/21/2016 3:49:14 PM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson