This article is from 2013, not 2016.
That was the poster’s point. He clarified it with his first comment.
it shocked the hell out of me for a minute.
knowing that he didn’t follow up at all makes a lot more sense, still putting that it was dated in the title would be good
dont know if thats possible :)
Should have put 2013. I did say in my comment section it was 3 years old. Don’t know how to change it.
You apparently read the article.
What are you trying to make everybody look bad?