Skip to comments.
Obama: 'Global War on Terror' Is Over
US News &World ^
| 5/13/2013
| Paul Shinkman
Posted on 07/17/2016 1:31:26 PM PDT by GilGil
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: GilGil
WW II was not fought against blitzkrieg. Bush or whoever thought of war on terrorism was nuts. People fight wars with the weapons available to them. I think Rumsfeld said something like that.
21
posted on
07/17/2016 1:50:54 PM PDT
by
ex-snook
(The one true God sent Jesus here to show us the way.)
To: unixfox
I’m just a poor boy can’t get no sympathy
`cause it’s easy come, easy go
22
posted on
07/17/2016 1:52:56 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: tumblindice
PAX TIBI.
To: tumblindice
Yeah. Any way the wind blows. Doesn’t really matter to me.
To: cloudmountain
The name is "terrorist" and s/he can be male, female, of any culture, any age and any nationality. I think the term 'warrior' is more accurate as their goal is conquest.
25
posted on
07/17/2016 1:54:57 PM PDT
by
bankwalker
(Does a fish know that it's wet?)
To: GilGil
Send back your FReeper membership badge and decoder ring.
26
posted on
07/17/2016 1:55:00 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
To: cloudmountain
Anulos qui animum ostendunt omnes gestemus!
27
posted on
07/17/2016 1:56:27 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: Billthedrill
I’m gonna have myself
A real good time
28
posted on
07/17/2016 1:57:10 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: SSS Two
C'mon!
You apparently read the article.
What are you trying to make everybody look bad?
29
posted on
07/17/2016 2:01:18 PM PDT
by
skimbell
To: bankwalker
I think the term 'warrior' is more accurate as their goal is conquest.Warriors are tools. They can be hired and fired. The old term was "mercenaries." Warriors want to live to fight another day...no suicide intended.
Terrorists are the idea makers/changers and thus far more dangerous. They are VERY willing to commit suicide for their idea. That's is why I think that they are FAR more dangerous.
We are clearly on the same page...just different views of the "book."
To: tumblindice
That’s why they call me Mr. Fahrenheit.
31
posted on
07/17/2016 2:02:38 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: tumblindice
Anulos qui animum ostendunt omnes gestemus!Obiter dictum...
To: GilGil
will not wage war against a tactic but will instead focus on a specific group of networks determined to destroy the U.S. Democrat Party is a network to consider.
33
posted on
07/17/2016 2:04:56 PM PDT
by
Mark
(Obama Care is now DEMOCRAT CARE)
To: cloudmountain
It must have been awkward for Queen when Freddie sang,
`I’m gonna make a supersonic man outta you!’
hmmm?
34
posted on
07/17/2016 2:06:37 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: tumblindice
He has a block on this one.... its the mirror, ~ that’s the problem
35
posted on
07/17/2016 2:07:45 PM PDT
by
himno hero
(hadnuff)
To: GilGil
36
posted on
07/17/2016 2:10:26 PM PDT
by
oblomov
(We have passed the point where "law," properly speaking, has any further application. - C. Thomas)
To: Sgt_Schultze
exactly,
the future does not belong to those who slander islam (America).
In the meanwhile Hillary is pursuing UN resolution 1618.
If she steps in , its just the Obama agenda one more time.
37
posted on
07/17/2016 2:10:32 PM PDT
by
himno hero
(hadnuff)
To: himno hero
38
posted on
07/17/2016 2:11:40 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: himno hero
Could this be why Obama will not say “radical Islamic terrorism?” Obama declared there is no terrorism 3 years ago. To admit to terrorism would mean an epic fail for Obama and make him look like a fool and ignoramus.
39
posted on
07/17/2016 2:14:38 PM PDT
by
GilGil
To: GilGil
I thought it was over when he was selected. Didn’t he/they say it was an “overseas contingent plan’ and not the war on terror?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson