Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel: Who was Nice attacker?
BBC ^ | July 15, 2016 | BBC

Posted on 07/16/2016 7:57:38 AM PDT by bgill

Locals said he was often seen drinking beer and never attended the small mosque near his block of flats. Anan, who lived on the ground floor, said she was suspicious of him because he was "a good-looking man who kept giving my two daughters the eye". One woman recalled that he was nice to her and helped her all the time. But, she said, his behaviour was sometimes "strange". He once asked to rent her mailbox and that when she refused he had called her "nasty", she added. When she learnt of the attack, she immediately wondered if he might have been involved.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bouhlel; france; jihad; nice; terrorism
He wanted to use a neighbors mailbox. Suuure, he was a lone wolf and we're having trouble untangling why he would run down people.
1 posted on 07/16/2016 7:57:38 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bgill

This unemployed ‘loner’ sent 84,000 pounds back to relatives in Tunisia last week.


2 posted on 07/16/2016 8:01:47 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

We know why he did this and we shouldn’t even speak his name.


3 posted on 07/16/2016 8:01:52 AM PDT by Aria (2016: The gravy train v Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria

They are never “lone wolves”. They have all been prompted and/or abetted by other muslims. BBC has reported others are being held in relation to the Nice attacker.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36813959


4 posted on 07/16/2016 8:06:53 AM PDT by littleharbour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bgill
Why do we always see these navel-gazing retrospectives when one of these slimeballs murders a bunch of people? Who cares who the killer was? Who cares what motivated him? It doesn't make the dead any more alive. And since nobody is going to do anything about it anyway, why give these pukes any more publicity than they already have?

Feed their bodies to the hogs and forget they ever existed.

5 posted on 07/16/2016 8:07:55 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

These murderers all have the same background: alcoholics, porn consumers, closet homos, strip club patrons, etc.

The Koran states that Allah automatically punches their ticket to heaven, no matter their background, if they kill the kaffirs (the unbelievers) in an act of jihad.


6 posted on 07/16/2016 8:09:32 AM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

In other words, he was one of those apparently “moderate muslims” that can be activated at any time.


7 posted on 07/16/2016 8:09:56 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

Obama can’t figure out his motive.

We are supposed to be liberal, per Obama and his guys. Being liberal means we can’t ascribe the actions of a Muslim to being affected by Islam, or committing atrocities in the name of Allah.

This mindset is part of what we are up against in this election. This is how liberals think. They think that we can’t say radical Muslims or radical Islamic terror because not all Muslims are terrorists.

Will western countries including this one, ever reach a point where we say we are in a war against radical Islamic terror? Will be treat these continual terror attacks, which seem to happen once a week now, as individual, one off, criminal acts, to be dealt with in our civilian criminal justice systems??? OR will we ever get to the point where they are treated as acts of war against our civilization?


8 posted on 07/16/2016 8:29:27 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
They think that we can’t say radical Muslims or radical Islamic terror because not all Muslims are terrorists.

But they can say all of white culture is structurally racist, eh?

9 posted on 07/16/2016 8:32:58 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

That’s right. Liberals can say that white culture is structurally racist, and that’s ok with them, because it supports a liberal viewpoint.

It’s very strange that liberals have differing criteria for how to view people and situations.

When the white kid went into the black church and shot black people, liberals had no problems ascribing his actions to racism. And then they launched a movement to get rid of the confederate flag.

But for any Muslims who commit any atrocity, we are told that not all Muslims are terrorists, and in any case, Islam is a religion of peace, and we are told that we just can’t say what his motivation was.

Even when killers shout “Allah Akbar”(sp), liberals still will not admit that such people are motivated by radical Islam.


10 posted on 07/16/2016 8:40:16 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Aria

Who cares? Next!

Destroy islam


11 posted on 07/16/2016 8:46:44 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

“OR will we ever get to the point where they are treated as acts of war against our civilization?”

My guess would be the attack(s) would need to be bigger for the liberals to do an about face. New York, or better still, some city in sacred California, would need to be nuked. But once the Jihad reaches that level of sophistication and capability it will be too late for a limited war where some Western civility will survive. What emerges on the other side will probably resemble an updated version of Nazi Germany rather than America of the 1950’s.+

Incidentally, if a city is nuked it will be a direct result of Obama’s policies.


12 posted on 07/16/2016 9:56:01 AM PDT by Gen.Blather (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bgill
Who was Nice attacker? I don't think what he did was very Nice.


13 posted on 07/16/2016 12:02:58 PM PDT by BBell (calm down and eat your sandwiches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

He once asked to rent her mailbox and that when she refused he had called her “nasty”, she added. When she learnt of the attack, she immediately wondered if he might have been involved.

...

He was a weirdo named Mohamed. People were suspicious but didn’t say anything because they don’t want to be Islamophobic. But even if they do, the authorities won’t find anything just like the FBI didn’t find anything on the Orlando mass murdering Muslim, even though he was reported.


14 posted on 07/16/2016 12:25:52 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson