I know one question that was answered very clearly: Does the law apply to everyone equally, or are the elites and well-connected exempt?
Queen Hillary has the answer for all these questions.
“Because I am Hillary and I am the Queen!”
How are FBI Director James Comey and a stuffed ferret alike?
They are both gutless weasels.
I have been puzzled at the timing of events.
In that, we had a year long complicated investigation done by the FBI.
Hillary was interviewed on a Saturday of a holiday weekend.
Comey came out on the following Tuesday morning, the first business day after Hillary’s interview, with his report.
It seems to me the report was already written, and the conclusions already drawn, before Hillary was interviewed by the FBI.
How did they, over a holiday weekend, pull together everything Hillary told them, combined with all other information they had, and produce a report so quickly??
Did lots of FBI workers get paid overtime/holiday pay over that weekend, to produce the report??
Was HIllary’s testimony really important to the final report?
Was the report already written up long before they talked to Hillary??
How the heck does Comey list out all of the shortcomings of Hillary’s email set up, but then conclude that there’s no prosecution warranted???
#1 Why is Hillary above the law?
The other unanswered question: was Comey blackmailed? Threatened? Or just bribed?
How many of the destroyed emails involved the Clinton Foundation and fraudulent transactions between State and the foundation as well as pay and play arrangements.
...
1. Who breached the air-gap between the State Dept SCIF and Hillary’s servers? There is no way to do this without violating the law. There is no way to do this unintentionally.
2. At whose direction? No one would dare do this unless they thought they had political air cover.
3. Are these people to be prosecuted? Of course not. We should be clear at this point in the arc of the Clintons’ reign of corruption how the system works.
4. Why not? A combination of willing cooperation and caution re Arkancide.
1. Was her husband's meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch a quid pro quo event?
2. Was there a gigantic conflict of interest with FBI Director James Comey on the Board of Directors of HSBC Holdings, the corporate parent of HSBC Bank, who has contributed a large sum of money to the Clinton Foundation?
Lying to the FBI is a crime, whether under oath or not.
There is a supposed written report that the FBI is to get to the Judiciary Cmt.
1. If thousands of emails sent back and forth between Hillary and her cadre of State Department sycophants did include classified material, why weren’t more of them labeled and stamped with the appropriate classification?
Hillary, herself, by virtue of being the Sec. State had the right and the duty to put labels on them if they weren’t marked when received.
We know she sent at least one email to an aide telling him to strip off the proper classification markings and send it via an unsecured fax.
2. Was this a common practice and instruction from her office on the handling of classified information?
3. Does this account for thousands of improperly sent emails in that department? They just stripped off the labels.
How can this woman be trusted with our nation’s nuclear codes?
The very acts of
to avoid leaving a FOIA-accessible record of her illegal [Clinton Foundation] actions, etc...
~~~~
Are de facto evidence of
and
#clintonPrivilege