Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fed. Gov. Authorizes Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to Censor “Anti-Islam” Speech; Lawsuit Filed
American Freedom Law Center ^

Posted on 07/13/2016 8:13:08 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: savagesusie
They have to advertise in BIG PRINT and UPFRONT that they CENSOR CHRISTIANITY and BAN certain 1st Amendment Rights and promote ISLAM.

This appears to be more of a wish list than actual fact.

21 posted on 07/13/2016 8:47:13 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Related:

“Sharia: Illinois To Create Official State Government Muslim Council”

By Pamela Geller on July 11, 2016

http://pamelageller.com/2016/07/sharia-illinois-to-create-official-state-government-muslim-council.html/


22 posted on 07/13/2016 8:47:19 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Some pigs are more equal than others.


23 posted on 07/13/2016 8:48:45 AM PDT by savagesusie (When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law. (Thomas A./Founders/John Marshall)/Nuremberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
Not in CA private business can’t.

Um, the forum you're currently using can and does censor posts, and drops posters. It is based in California, and is a private business.

24 posted on 07/13/2016 8:59:53 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Warning: This post has little to do with reality, and nothing to do with polite society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

Did you read the filing?


25 posted on 07/13/2016 9:01:06 AM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
They should be able to do what they want, but CA won’t allow any private business to discriminate for any reason, so why let Facebook get away with it?

This forum does the same. It censors posts (deletes them), censors posters or removes access for posters, and controls the content. It is based in California.

26 posted on 07/13/2016 9:01:44 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Warning: This post has little to do with reality, and nothing to do with polite society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Excellence
Did you read the filing?

Yes, I did. How does Facebook differ from FR? FR censors posts and removes users for things FR deems improper or out of alignment with its values.

27 posted on 07/13/2016 9:04:34 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Warning: This post has little to do with reality, and nothing to do with polite society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

I don’t think they’re equivalent.


28 posted on 07/13/2016 9:12:27 AM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS
How does Facebook differ from FR?

The only fundamental difference I can think of is Facebook exists to mine and sell its members' data.

Otherwise, you already know the answer.

29 posted on 07/13/2016 9:17:07 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: gdani
But it's a private business - they can do what they want.

There are wedding cake bakers who would disagree with that statement.

30 posted on 07/13/2016 9:20:18 AM PDT by LSAggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

The Control of Words and Language will control beliefs and emotions of the masses and is a MIND CONTROL system to make the masses into “happy slaves” of the State. That is why people like Stalin and Lenin and Hitler always control ALL the ideas/words, etc. their people hear- and all the books they are allowed to read—and they KILL those who go off the Narrative (like Andrew Breitbart). (That is how CRUCIAL ideas are.)

Only Truth will set you Free—give you Free Will (choice). With lies and misinformation (all MSM) we are slaves of the state and dupes/pawns and controlled only by emotions.

Wittgenstein and ALL history proves that whoever controls the information of the masses (controls Words), will control the Minds of the masses. Facebook/Twitter, Google, etc. are all highly controlled by a few psychopathic elites, and is embedded with sophisticated psychology to control your emotions and “thinking” which is NEVER “thinking”. Eddy Bernays perfected “marketing of ideas” by 1910. Lenin, Stalin and Hitler copied his ideas and methods (he was Freud’s nephew).

Twitter, Facebook, Google are a great propaganda source. They can completely control the Narrative (the proper emotions in the masses by use of words/placement of images.) It is extremely powerful, and in evil hands can be diabolical and extremely DANGEROUS—esp. to the young who have no real life experiences or been exposed to Truth (the Great Books and Wisdom of the Ages.

All people in control of these platforms are ALL agents of Satan—the psychopathic sodomites, who control the banks/wall street, etc. Otherwise, they would not be alive. That is how the system has worked since Wilson was put into office and the CFR created. Go with their globalization—or you will not live.

It is exactly like the radio and TV and schools were in the past. The masses were shaped by the media (and believed it and bought the lies continually—enough to fight wars for the psychopaths to make them filthy rich so they could control everything, even the Supreme Court).

These programs addict and keep people from seeking Truth (God) and real life experiences (Wisdom) and having real-life interactions with real human beings (dehumanization).

It creates an artificial reality of agitprop—which is only designed to control emotions and keep you from Wisdom, so you can NEVER think coherently (with is only done with wisdom and true knowledge).

How is works: Put together the words “homosexual” marriage which is an oxymoron and completely unnatural and dumb and evil, and repeat it over and over and over-—and it becomes “good” and “truth” (LOLOL) and a Reality. (Esp. when children are told lies over and over in schools (a reality) and to take “Pride” (a vice) in sodomy (a vice)-—which literally flips 2000 years of ethics to irrational Satanism (Ba’al Rites))

We live in a culture of controlled Words/Language/Images and most people live in the Matrix and put their children into Ba’als he/she hands-—so the sick, perversions of the sick, orchestrated Reality of the psychopaths are embedded into the sub conscience of your children (They “think” like Satanists where sodomy and baby-sacrifice is a virtue). The psychopaths want us all in cages and drugged, to be their consumers and interchangeable worker “bots” (and all individuality— identity, even male/female, will be ERASED in children).


31 posted on 07/13/2016 9:28:11 AM PDT by savagesusie (When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law. (Thomas A./Founders/John Marshall)/Nuremberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSAggie
>>>But it's a private business - they can do what they want.

There are wedding cake bakers who would disagree with that statement.

Context is everything. In this case, it's about the ability of social media websites to limit speech, not cake bakers.

32 posted on 07/13/2016 9:31:54 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

Facebook is only censoring anything they deem offensive to Islam only. Discrimination laws usually apply to protected groups, of which political ideologies are not.


33 posted on 07/13/2016 9:33:50 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gdani

” But it’s a private business - they can do what they want.”

Unless you own a lunch counter.


34 posted on 07/13/2016 9:35:19 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
Unless you own a lunch counter.

See my response in #32

35 posted on 07/13/2016 9:37:49 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gdani

The purpose of social media websites is ‘speech’.

Just like the purpose of lunch counters is to serve lunch.

And the purpose of cake bakers is to serve cake.


36 posted on 07/13/2016 9:53:04 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

I have mixed emotions about this.

1. We have freedom of speech granted by our Constitution.
2. Businesses are owned by PRIVATE investors and can regulate what is on their internet sites. It is not a violation of free speech for it is a matter of judgement by the owners (not the users) as to what the site is utilized for.
3. We (the people) have complete control over our own will to go there or not. When we do, it increases their advertising revenues and membership fees (if applicable). If we don’t go there, it could possibly affect their revenues. However, they are the ones...not the visitors...who make the call.
4. If you don’t like it...simply don’t go there!

The minute the government comes in and MAKES THEM publish everything anyone posts there, our First Amendment will be the casualty and will be a trophy for those who wish the government to control all thought and speech.

Get over it.....it’s a business!


37 posted on 07/13/2016 10:28:36 AM PDT by DH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

The slow track to sharia.


38 posted on 07/13/2016 10:30:55 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdani

Yes, in today’s “Justice” system, it is definitely a wish.

But a wish to return to our true (constitutional) Justice System, where fraud and lies could be prosecuted (LOL—criminals run our “Justice” system now). The “Free Press” should be held accountable for their lies but we devolved into fascism where truth is banned from not only the public schools, but the public square.

Truth is crucial to Freedom and Free Will (choice) so any organization that puts out information is required to promote the Truth. (That is the Constitutional concept).

As Solzhenitsyn stated in 78, there is no liability for the US Press or journalists for lying and misleading the masses, and for deliberately repeating lies —None. They are never held accountable for anything and he noted that our “Press” was worse than Pravda because the useful idiots in America believed they were getting the “truth”.

With any Natural Right, there is a Natural Duty which is embedded in a true “justice” system. (I know the Marxist welfare system removed “Duties” from our vocabularies.)

So Twitter—etc., think their “duties” with such a powerful media platform is to control it (which is fine), and promote the globalist narrative (which is evil, and undermines our Constitution).

They rearrage the “Trending News”, ban anything which debunks their lies about islam, rig the google search results to create the desired “perceptions”, block Wikipedia entries, and hide (ban) articles which show rapes of boys and girls, esp. if they are by a Hollywood producer or in the White House or are “aliens”.

Control is great-—if they don’t promote lies and misinformation and the wrong perceptions in the masses. Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Control of Words/Images is extremely powerful and with that power comes a duty always, a public trust, as with all businesses, to promote truth.

We need to expect that our airwaves will be used for public virtue and truth-—not vice and lies, which only enslave and kill and destroy cultures, since free civil societies depend on Virtue, or will collapse into tyranny.

Until the journalists/elites are held responsible for all the chaos and deaths they cause by intentional lies and suppression of the truth, we will not have any freedom, any Free Will, or any “Justice”. (No Constitution and no Rule of Law).


39 posted on 07/13/2016 10:46:11 AM PDT by savagesusie (When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law. (Thomas A./Founders/John Marshall)/Nuremberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

obama does not have the authority to abridge our First Amendment rights and he most certainly does not have any Constitutional authority to give someone else power to abridge First Amendment rights.


40 posted on 07/13/2016 10:48:24 AM PDT by fightin kentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson