Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Links to nro piece.
1 posted on 07/08/2016 11:00:03 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

The wording now is “shall not be unreasonably unhinged.”

Obama has made sure people have become unhinged.


2 posted on 07/08/2016 11:21:06 AM PDT by Candor7 ( Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

3 posted on 07/08/2016 11:21:25 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I guess this is about, what, 100 years too late?

As Mark Levin often says, we’re living in the post-Constitution age.

The words don’t mean sh*t. All that matters is whatever any five (currently, four) SCOTUS justices say it says.


4 posted on 07/08/2016 11:32:57 AM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman; All
Regarding constitutional gun rights, patriots need to get a grip on the idea that the feds have only those powers which the states have delegated to the feds expressly via the Constitution.

In fact, a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified, using broad language, that powers not delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, are prohibited to the feds.

”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.

And while the states have constitutionally delegated to the feds the specific power to support and regulate the armed forces as evidenced by several clauses in the Constitution’s Secton 8 of Article I, the states have never constitutionally delegated the specific power to regulate civilian-related arms imo.

It is disturbing to note that federal regulations for personal protection firearms seemingly didn’t start appearing in the books until FDR was president, FDR and the Congress at that time infamous for making laws which Congress could not justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers.

Franklin Roosevelt: The Father of Gun Control

5 posted on 07/08/2016 12:28:04 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

The Left uses every, single bogus excuse it can muster to come after law-abiding firearms owners.


6 posted on 07/08/2016 1:47:47 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Get ready. Just like mass murderer Mateen in Orlando, and before that two murderous, radical muslims in San Bernardino, the lefts’ attack drumbeat has started once again—while the victims still fight for their lives.

Here the murderer was a black power radical who admits to hating white people, but once again the fault lies with us racist, bigoted palefaces and our evil firearms.

Here’s their logic: We shouldn’t judge all members of the ROP on the actions of a few, but all gun owners should be judged by the actions of a few hate-filled minorities.

The left is deranged. It’s no wonder they are so hateful.


7 posted on 07/08/2016 1:53:26 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson