Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jessduntno
Intent has no bearing on this case.

Gowdy addressed the intent element of one of the pertinent statutes but dropped the ball, perhaps intentionally for someone with his experience, with regard to the "gross negligence" aspect of the more important statute.

Comey was careful to not use the statutory phrase, "gross negligence" in his statement, but rather described Clinton's behavior as "extremely reckless".

That distinction, or lack of distinction and the relevant federal decisions is were the legal battle should have been, but Gowdy ducked.

65 posted on 07/07/2016 10:14:18 AM PDT by frog in a pot (Evil are those who deny their fellow man the means of self-defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: frog in a pot

One of the elements of res mensa is recklessness. The precise definition of recklessness has been contested and has evolved. It generally involves a person pursuing a course of action while consciously disregarding the fact that the action gives rise to a substantial and unjustifiable risk.

That’s what she did.


71 posted on 07/07/2016 10:26:57 AM PDT by JeanLM (Obama proves melanin is just enough to win elections)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson