I think that's wishful thinking. The quote from the NYT already acknowledges the sale and the link to the Clinton Foundation, so they've already dealt with it to the extent that they will. They're not going to run further stories that would hurt their gal HRC. Nothing will come of this.
It will not be necessary for the New York Times to run additional stories at all. The fact that their own paper ran it is enough to make the story credible in and of itself. This story just needs to be circulated widely by the Trump campaign in the form, as I suggested, of a campaign ad.