Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BradtotheBone

Yes, to anyone who works for the federal government with a security clearance, the email story is plain. She broke the law. Several, really. So, the question is; Is Hillary Clinton above the law? That is where we stand. The old statement, “nobody is above the law” is being tested. It’s possible that Hillary may be. Agnew wasn’t, Nixon wasn’t, Hastert wasn’t, but Hillary??? Maybe?

You can’t read this story and not see several laws being broken. And the defense that previous Secretaries of State did it, doesn’t hold water. Because they were working under previous rules, and previous technology, and previous laws. Hillary had very specific laws and rules, which she blatantly ignored. How about the part where she tells an underling to remove the Top Security warning and send the email anyway.


46 posted on 07/03/2016 6:18:03 AM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: poinq

shrillary let TS/SCI SAP info sit unsecured, whether intentionally or not.

Doing that carries a severe penalty.

She better not slither out from being charged; if she does, then it sets the whole security clearance system on its head.

Many many people have been held to stringent standards, in order to work in SAP program jobs that require access to TS/SCI information.

Shrillary skating would tell those folks that their efforts are in vain.


73 posted on 07/03/2016 2:43:51 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson