Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Clinton reiterated that she never sent or received material marked classified on her private server.”

And “ I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.....”

The word trick here is “sexual relations”. He just sodomized her with a cigar and let her give him Lewinskys, but not (supposedly) “sexual relations” (intercourse).

In Hillary’s case, she always says “ “Most importantly I never sent classified material on my email and I never received any that was marked classified,””

The word trick here is “classified”. “classified” is not a classification. It is a general term pertaining to all types of data that is to be protected from everyone except those having the proper clearance and a “NEED TO KNOW”.

Nothing is “marked” “classified”. They would be “marked” “TOP SECRET” (in orange), “SECRET” (in red), or “CONFIDENTIAL” (in blue), for example.

Top and bottom of every page. The cover would be marked with the highest classification used in the document. If one word was classified TOP SECRET, the the entire page would be marked TOP SECRET and the cover would have to be marked TOP SECRET even if all the rest of the data was only CONFIDENTIAL.

Hillary’s word games will not protect her from her mishandling classified materials, just as Bill’s didn’t protect him from mishandling Ms Lewinsky.

http://electrospaces.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-us-classification-system.html


20 posted on 07/03/2016 5:27:15 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: faucetman
Clinton reiterated that she never sent or received material marked classified on her private server.

As if that's an exoneration. It is not. As SOS, it was her job and her duty to recognized classified content and safeguard it. She did not.

The Espionage Act essentially made it a crime for any person to convey information intended to interfere with the U.S. armed forces prosecution of the war effort or to promote the success of the country’s enemies.

It doesn't have to be intentional.

23 posted on 07/03/2016 6:17:53 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: faucetman

It interests me that the “no messages MARKED classified” defense is all she can come up with. This isn’t a rational defense, just a fig leaf her slaves can use to play pretend.

If spies could walk if the Top Secret material they were caught stealing was not “marked”, their first move every time would be to remove the markings.

I wonder if Gen. Petraeus marked his journals as “classified” before leaving them in his dwelling where his girlfriend, an Army Reserve Intel officer WITH A SECURITY CLEARANCE read them.


24 posted on 07/03/2016 6:19:20 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson