Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Call this journalism?

Did the DNC write this for you?

1 posted on 07/02/2016 4:18:26 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Sub-Driver

Nothing the Clinton’s do “rises to the level of crime...”


2 posted on 07/02/2016 4:22:02 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

“..even if its actual content was purely social, as Ms. Lynch maintains and as we believe.”

Does ANYBODY really believe that?


3 posted on 07/02/2016 4:22:35 AM PDT by heterosupremacist ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

When I saw this title I knew it was either from The New York Times or The Washington Post. Yea, I’ll bet they think it’s time to move on.


4 posted on 07/02/2016 4:25:06 AM PDT by Vision (Best Radio Station Ever: www.MartiniInTheMorning.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

“...because she did not set up and use the server with the legally requisite criminal intent or even with “gross negligence,” as it has been defined in relevant case law.”

Hillary Clinton bent over backwards with the premeditated intent to violate the law.

If that is not criminal intent, then the concept must be abandoned forever.


5 posted on 07/02/2016 4:25:44 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I prefer “Off with her head” to “winding down”

Hillary Clinton is an enemy of the Republic. Her E mail fiasco proves she has no regard for the Republic and holding a high office allowed secrets of the state to escape to who knows where.


6 posted on 07/02/2016 4:26:20 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

And so, Wapo believes HRC is innocent...in other news, water has been found to be wet.


7 posted on 07/02/2016 4:29:03 AM PDT by Don@VB (Power Corrupts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Our view of the matter, stated in previous editorials and supported by a fair reading of the law and publicly available evidence, is that Ms. Clinton committed a grave error in judgment,

...

But Amazon’s newspaper would still back her for president in spite of the grave error in judgment.


8 posted on 07/02/2016 4:30:40 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Yeah! Wind it down and issue the freekin indictment. A jury will never convict her but at least she’ll face humiliation.


9 posted on 07/02/2016 4:32:34 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: The land of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Right on time.
Washington comPost coming in like the cavalry to save the Clintons and the Democrats from the savages.


10 posted on 07/02/2016 4:53:03 AM PDT by Tupelo (we vote - THEY decide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Laughable if it weren’t so serious...


12 posted on 07/02/2016 5:00:05 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

True journalism... LOL.


13 posted on 07/02/2016 5:01:58 AM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

It’s time to wind down the Clinton email investigation before the truth gets out.


14 posted on 07/02/2016 5:03:43 AM PDT by Ray76 (The evil effect of Obergefell is to deprive the people of rule of law & subject us to tyranny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

FBI Probe of Clintons “Will Have Momentous Results!”

http://investmentwatchblog.com/fbi-probe-of-clintons-will-have-momentous-results/


15 posted on 07/02/2016 5:07:34 AM PDT by Jamesmm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

No it is only beginning!


17 posted on 07/02/2016 5:16:29 AM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Boycott Amazon ..

Billionaire Learjet Leftist Bezo has abused his power and made the Compost his DNC Newsletter !

Even the Graham con artist family never went this far . From the lib rag that drove a GOP Pres from office this screed is pretty outrageous propaganda belch by the radicals running this rag .

18 posted on 07/02/2016 5:25:52 AM PDT by ncalburt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Says the paid Democrat liars at the Washington Lost.


19 posted on 07/02/2016 5:29:12 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
However, her conduct does not seem to rise to the level of indictable crime, because she did not set up and use the server with the legally requisite criminal intent or even with “gross negligence,” as it has been defined in relevant case law.

Here is where they have it wrong - DEAD WRONG. No "criminal intent" - or ANY intent - is required to establish violation of the "Federal Records Act". She "failed to take care" of public documents, period in a grossly negligent way, which is indicative of why her IT guy is getting immunity and/or pleading the fifth.

21 posted on 07/02/2016 6:13:21 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
This comes from the Washington Post, right?

Just wondering, did Bob Woodard contribute to this piece? Was he asked to comment for the record?

I need to hear what he has to say, to know if he's as much a biased hypocrite as the paper he works for.

So, Bob, do you agree that Watergate was a big deal, but this is not? Why?

23 posted on 07/02/2016 6:53:06 AM PDT by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
To her credit, Ms. Lynch acknowledged her misstep Friday in an interview with The Post’s Jonathan Capehart at the Aspen Ideas Festival in Colorado.

LOL - Yes, Loretta Lynch used the NEW AND IMPROVED EXCUSE - she said "I wouldn't do it again". That's the same excuse Hillary gave on having a hackable server in her home... It's the de jour excuse for liberal liars... and has replaced the hackneyed "I take full responsibility' which in liberal-speak means 'eff off'.

Nice to see the brain dead butt kissers at the Washington Post falling for this... as if any effort had to be made to convince them.

24 posted on 07/02/2016 7:09:15 AM PDT by GOPJ (If the U.S. had treated EACH German SS as a 'lone wolf' would we have lost World War II?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

The Ministry of Propaganda does get some of their stuff directly from the DNC. And some from the RNC. And some from the Cheap Labor Express.
None of it is news. Or truth.


25 posted on 07/02/2016 7:16:58 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson