Why did the author even blather on about the legal mumbo jumbo and twists of words back and forth to argue both sides?
This is FREAKING SIMPLE!!!! Illegal Alien A broke the law to come into this country...THEREFORE any and all activities while here is by nature illegal, including having a child!!! The president (questionable illegal alien B) decides to not follow the law with respect to enforcement of illegal alien A when it is very specific to deportation.
Why the hell is this even being discussed anymore? Why hasn’t Congress moved for articles of impeachment?!?! I no longer blame this President, quite frankly I’m no longer mad or disgusted with him.
His actions or lack thereof can and should be completely governed by the body elected to keep the branch in check! I’m disgusted with Congress and quite frankly every member can go to h3ll
There's a simple answer: they agree with it.
First, let's assume that the birther conspiracy is true: if it is then not only this Congress, but all of those involved in the Presidency of Obama are either supportive or willfully ignorant of the damage installing a foreigner into the Presidency is. Moreover, the particular Congress that certified Obama's [initial] election are a direct party to this overthrow of Constitutional constraints.
Next, consider the Court system's response: they've denied every birther case on standing
, which means they refuse to hear any arguments or weigh any evidence, effectively telling the complainants to sit down and shut up
… and they must dismiss the arguments and evidence out of hand, otherwise the conspiracy of the congress to install the ineligible would be made plain. (The powerful cannot let that happen, as to do so would be to sacrifice all their bought-and-paid-for Congressmen to zero gain. [And, indeed, significant risk… because their involvement with the corrupt congress would open them to investigation.])
Third, consider the Iran deal
, literal treason, yet considered to be legitimate and binding. (This is independent of the birther case, but additional evidence of Congress's duplicity.)
Fourth, the multiple decades where Congress promised to secure the border. (And look at what a fuss they've thrown up against a candidate who threatens to do just that by building a wall.)
Fifth, look at how Congress enacts laws and policies that benefit illegal aliens. (H1B visas, which are rife with fraud; welfare, etc)
The cumulative effect of the Congress allowing all of this to happen is the replacement of the native citizenry; why?
I believe the answer is simple: they have no loyalty to you or I and see us as little more than cattle to be ranched for money and votes — and in that sense we're decidedly more of a risk (as traditionally the American is distrustful of [the motives of] those in authority) and, as such, it is a smart move
to replace the American people with those who are used to governmental corruption and graft, who will not put their foot down and say ENOUGH!
I think this mindset explains far too many of our government's policies and actions over the past few decades to be dismissed easily, and it leads to the unpleasant conclusion that it it time to water the Tree of Liberty.
And the worst is he can veto anything they do and they have to come up with enough votes to override and that ain’t gonna happen anytime soon.
The system only works if all sides are working for THIS country and within the constitution.
Even if a law was somehow magically passed, he would simply ignore it and make his own law.
A lot of impeachments need to happen.