This does nothing of the sort. The author is misinformed, or more likely, lying. This merely defined if a misdemeanor crime of DV had to have the Mens Ria — the ‘guilty mind’ — of intent. If DV occured because someone was angrily throwing vases at a wall, and the wife was near, and a splinter accidentally injured her, then he’s guilty of DV.
That’s all. Not a “cutting of the legs off the NRA” at all.
how many police officers are now no longer eligible to possess firearms?