I can believe the polls that show the race is tight in swing states, but these polls showing a double digit lead for Clinton are ridiculous. I hear what people are saying.
Watched Pat Caddell on FNC earlier this evening; he said the ABC News/WaPo poll is always the outlier among MSM surveys and noted they have a long history of over-sampling Dims, hence that double-digit lead for Hillary. He also chided Doug Schoen for touting HRC’s lead in the swing states when most of those polls are within the margin of error.
Take any poll you see this year with a huge grain of salt. It’s becoming more and more difficult to develop a realistic model and generate a sample that accurately reflects the modeling.
Additionally, to no one’s real surprise, all of the FNC “political insiders” said the “revolt” movement in the U.S. is much further along than it is in Britain and we know what happened in the U.K. last week.