Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Ruling On Polarizing Immigration Executive Order Could Come This Week
patch.com ^ | 6/22/2016 | Tony Cantu

Posted on 06/22/2016 2:17:04 PM PDT by Elderberry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Elderberry

Baby Segura can go back to Mexico with his parents, very simple solution.

We have got to end this automatic citizenship to babies dropped in the US by people who are here illegally. And who stick the local citizens with the bill for the kid’s delivery. Does any other country on the planet do that? It makes no sense, but it’s taken advantage of by these illegals.

This sob story also failed to mention that the U.S. attorneys from the DOJ lied to the court about their implementation of the act despite the court ordered hold, and his ordering the entire DOJ legal team (lawyers across the country) to have to take ethics courses to prevent future lying to the court.


21 posted on 06/22/2016 2:47:15 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

Thank you.


22 posted on 06/22/2016 2:54:58 PM PDT by cld51860 (Volo pro veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: henkster
Thank you for your informed analysis.

By reading this, many FReepers could learn about the legal issues & procedures, and also about how to post a coherent, well-argued opinion properly.

23 posted on 06/22/2016 2:56:59 PM PDT by goldbux (When you're odd the odds are with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Does so

Nope.

Broken record time for me. SCOTUS (or at least the left half) is hopelessly politicized. They render decisions based on ideology and agenda and not the law or the Constitution.

As long as it’s an even split there will be no sense coming out of SCOTUS.


24 posted on 06/22/2016 3:00:04 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Now we will learn if there is any point to having a Congress.
BigEars thinks all you need is a pen, a phone and the Court system


25 posted on 06/22/2016 3:00:36 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KittenClaws

Precisely!


26 posted on 06/22/2016 3:13:13 PM PDT by onyx (DONATE MONTHLY because YOU POST HERE! VOTE TRUMP, at least once!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

DAPA aka the “get pregnant and walk across the border” EO.


27 posted on 06/22/2016 3:32:32 PM PDT by mumblypeg (Make America Sane Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

I miss Scalia so much.


28 posted on 06/22/2016 3:48:05 PM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KittenClaws

“The little tyke can come on back when he reaches 21.”

The Constitutional language which allows is open to another interpretation, IMO. I don’t think the founders meant for this to be as it is.


29 posted on 06/22/2016 3:59:34 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
They (SCOTUS) render decisions based on ideology and agenda and not the law or the Constitution.

Exactly why SCOTUS justices need term limits. Say... 20 years?

30 posted on 06/22/2016 4:15:10 PM PDT by upchuck (I'm hanging here until my Free Republic 401K is fully vested.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry
"We have a 4-year-old son, and he needs to be with me and his father always," she said at the February rally. "My son was born in this country. He has a right to be with his parents.”

Ignorant people, who are also arrogant and criminally bent have a technique that seems to work every time, illegal though it may be.

It's called changing the subject midpoint through a plausible argument.

Yes, the little bastards may be arguably citizens ( a whole different subject) but that's not the key to their fallacious argument.

It is also reasonable for the illegal adults to argue that the little bastards have a "right" to be with its parents, historically a non argument.

But at that point the illegal's argument goes off the rails, Because there are two ways that goal can be achieved : The minor "American" bastards can go back to Mexico and remain with their parents (or wherever,) until they reach a majority and then return to the U.S. or...

They can request to remain in the United states, but that option is not theirs to make. It is made according to the immigration laws of the United States.

The third option is seldom taken : Leave the minor children with a CLOSE relative who is legally in the United states. Except that frustrates the original intent of their argument, which is to skirt the laws of the host country.

If they can be given conditional residence until the child reaches a majority, which would then expire, AND also conditioned on no right to welfare or public assistance of any kind.

I think most Americans would have no serious opposition to that.

But we all know THAT'S not going likely to happen.

31 posted on 06/22/2016 4:18:50 PM PDT by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I’m generally not a proponent of term limits but regarding SCOTUS I think you have a point.


32 posted on 06/22/2016 4:55:59 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Before we know it, there will be a rumor spread through all of the countries south of our southern border stating that Gringos are stealing their children.


33 posted on 06/22/2016 5:41:10 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

...and Gringas.


34 posted on 06/22/2016 5:41:34 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

You are my new best friend. Thank you for analyzing as though the laws still matter; you give me hope that perhaps we are not at the end of the Republic.


35 posted on 06/22/2016 9:24:23 PM PDT by mrreaganaut (Well, I guess my candidate got Trumped...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
To: Does so

Nope.

Broken record time for me. SCOTUS (or at least the left half) is hopelessly politicized. They render decisions based on ideology and agenda and not the law or the Constitution.

As long as it’s an even split there will be no sense coming out of SCOTUS.

How is this not "good news"? The lower court was affirmed. This is a defeat for Obama and Illegals.

36 posted on 06/24/2016 9:50:08 PM PDT by Does so (Vote for Hillary...Stay Home...==8-O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson