[Rusty0604]

Read the whole article. He goes on about Trump using information from the Clinton cash book that has been debunked.

[Fungi]

Who debunked it? You sound like David Gergen, always start with a false premise and hope you don’t get called on it.

[HarleyLady27]

They can say it is ‘debunked’ but you don't see the Clintons or anyone else suing the Author of the book...

Just like with Roger Stone on “War on Women” Just like with Roger Stone on “Jeb! and the Bush Crime Family”...and just like the book coming out this week...

If it isn't the truth, they can't print it...writing books is not like writing the news, you have to have links, documentation, that will hold up in court...

[detective]

“Read the whole article. He goes on about Trump using information from the Clinton cash book that has been debunked.”

The information in Clinton Cash is true. It was never debunked.

The author is a she(Michelle Goldberg) not a he. This is from Slate, a Clinton propaganda website that is against Trump. The article is dishonest and slanted against Trump. But even these paid liars have been forced to admit it was effective.

[combat_boots]

"Clinton cash book that has NOT been debunked."

[sauropod]

The Clinton cash book has NOT been debunked. Just because a liberal claims something doesn’t make it true.

[Nifster]

Except it hasn’t been debunked. That is the meme of the left. The foot notes are chilling

[RoosterRedux]

If the book had been debunked, Hillary would be suing the author.

To my knowledge, she's not.

[SamAdams76]

I shall have to take issue with you on this. The “Clinton Cash” book has not been debunked. It is actually well researched and footnoted.

Crooked Hillary has no rebuttal. Trump is slowly and surely pinning her into a corner.

[Radix]

If there were anything debunked in that ‘Clinton Cash’ book, it would have been a top of the fold headline story that never goes away.

[oscar_diggs]

He goes on about Trump using information from the Clinton cash book that has been debunked.
****************
When RATS say something has been “debunked” it generally means that they overheard someone at the local bar complain about how “it can’t possibly be true” between bourbon shots.

Words to them don’t really have a meaning that we can pin down ... they mean whatever they want them to mean at that particular time...

Why don’t you give us the most damning misstatement from the book to look at? I’ll bet that if anything has been disproved it’s something minor such as quoting a $25,000,000.00 gift from some saudi prince instead of the correct amount of “$25M and a Diamond encrusted Gold bracelet”...