Skip to comments.
The president just signed a law that affects nearly every product you use
Washington Post ^
| June 22, 2016
| By Darryl Fears
Posted on 06/22/2016 12:01:50 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Just what America needs - a more powerful and aggressive EPA.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
How about market and the consumers decide what is “toxic” and what is not.
2
posted on
06/22/2016 12:03:42 PM PDT
by
sagar
To: Oldeconomybuyer
3
posted on
06/22/2016 12:03:43 PM PDT
by
McGruff
(How about investigating the donations to the Clinton Foundation)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Oh great. More power in the hands of a federal bureaucracy.
And they wonder why Trump won the Republican contest.
SICK OF INSIDERS. SICK OF THE NANNY STATE!
4
posted on
06/22/2016 12:04:09 PM PDT
by
SoFloFreeper
((Just say no to HRC))
To: Oldeconomybuyer
You read right, America.
In the midst of Obama’s EPA rampaging through every facet of your lives, the Republicans just voted to give it MORE POWER.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I’m more worried about toxic politicians.
6
posted on
06/22/2016 12:05:41 PM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(Hey now baby, get into my big black car, I just want to show you what my politics are.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Just which chemicals are these?
7
posted on
06/22/2016 12:05:55 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....eI aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I would fire the lot of them! Every state already has their own EPA laws. The feds are just THUGS.
8
posted on
06/22/2016 12:06:06 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Sounds like it is modeling the California law.
Ever read the fine print on something and see words to the effect “This product contains ingredients known to the State of California to cause cancer”?
10
posted on
06/22/2016 12:07:34 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Another reason to vote for Trump, as he said he would close their doors for good.
To: Paladin2
Just which chemicals are these?
Dihydrogen monoxide
12
posted on
06/22/2016 12:09:42 PM PDT
by
Bratch
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I'm guessing they are Californizing the entire country.
For many years, it has been standard procedure in my family to select chemical/cleaning products by looking for the "not for sale in California" label. Things that aren't for sale in California usually work better.
To: Yo-Yo
Living in the loonie bin called the State of California is known to cause cancer and mental illness. My wife and I moved out in 1984.
14
posted on
06/22/2016 12:12:22 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
To: Bratch
15
posted on
06/22/2016 12:12:33 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....eI aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
If he signed a bill then it had to come from congress. There is shared blame here.
16
posted on
06/22/2016 12:14:31 PM PDT
by
bubbacluck
(America 180)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Unlike the old version, the new law allows the EPA to stop a potentially dangerous chemical from going to market. Like lead and gunpowder?
17
posted on
06/22/2016 12:14:40 PM PDT
by
GregoTX
To: Bratch
Dihydrogen monoxide
Yikes, that's dangerous stuff... and it's everywhere.
18
posted on
06/22/2016 12:15:46 PM PDT
by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: vsEPAwarrior
I think Rush has repeatedly pointed out is that the way to kill these bureaucracies is to de-fund, de-fund, de-fund. It seems that more and more that is not an option. Even if this weak and compliant congress could be coerced to cut funds, someone would sue and the courts would say it's illegal to do so. It's absurd, of course, but that's where we are. Look at the efforts to cut funding to planned parenthood.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Here’s the list:
Tobacco = BAD
Marijuana = GOOD
/sarc
20
posted on
06/22/2016 12:18:21 PM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson