Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The president just signed a law that affects nearly every product you use
Washington Post ^ | June 22, 2016 | By Darryl Fears

Posted on 06/22/2016 12:01:50 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

President Obama signed a bill into law Wednesday that places stronger regulations on chemicals present in nearly every product Americans use, including detergents, clothing, paint thinners, cleansers and automobiles.

The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act passed by Congress early this month in a rare bipartisan vote. It updates the Toxic Substances Control Act, which had not been reauthorized since the Ford administration in the mid-1970s. The new law gives the Environmental Protection Agency more oversight and stronger tools to monitor chemicals that in some cases could cause cancer and other health problems in adults and children.

EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said the TSCA was well meant when it was originally passed but "without major changes to the law, EPA couldn't take the actions necessary to protect people from toxic chemicals."

"The updated law gives EPA the authorities we need to protect American families from the health effects of dangerous chemicals," McCarthy said in a statement. And at EPA, we're excited to get to work putting it into action."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; chemicals; epa; epaoutofcontrol; executiveoverreach; gopestablishment; regulations; rinos; toxicsubstances
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Just what America needs - a more powerful and aggressive EPA.
1 posted on 06/22/2016 12:01:50 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

How about market and the consumers decide what is “toxic” and what is not.


2 posted on 06/22/2016 12:03:42 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

He’s dead Jim.


3 posted on 06/22/2016 12:03:43 PM PDT by McGruff (How about investigating the donations to the Clinton Foundation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Oh great. More power in the hands of a federal bureaucracy.

And they wonder why Trump won the Republican contest.

SICK OF INSIDERS. SICK OF THE NANNY STATE!


4 posted on 06/22/2016 12:04:09 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper ((Just say no to HRC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

You read right, America.

In the midst of Obama’s EPA rampaging through every facet of your lives, the Republicans just voted to give it MORE POWER.


5 posted on 06/22/2016 12:04:55 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I’m more worried about toxic politicians.


6 posted on 06/22/2016 12:05:41 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hey now baby, get into my big black car, I just want to show you what my politics are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Just which chemicals are these?


7 posted on 06/22/2016 12:05:55 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....eI aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I would fire the lot of them! Every state already has their own EPA laws. The feds are just THUGS.


8 posted on 06/22/2016 12:06:06 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Sounds like it is modeling the California law.

Ever read the fine print on something and see words to the effect “This product contains ingredients known to the State of California to cause cancer”?


10 posted on 06/22/2016 12:07:34 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Another reason to vote for Trump, as he said he would close their doors for good.


11 posted on 06/22/2016 12:08:26 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Just which chemicals are these?

Dihydrogen monoxide

12 posted on 06/22/2016 12:09:42 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I'm guessing they are Californizing the entire country.

For many years, it has been standard procedure in my family to select chemical/cleaning products by looking for the "not for sale in California" label. Things that aren't for sale in California usually work better.

13 posted on 06/22/2016 12:10:04 PM PDT by j. earl carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Living in the loonie bin called the State of California is known to cause cancer and mental illness. My wife and I moved out in 1984.


14 posted on 06/22/2016 12:12:22 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Deadly...


15 posted on 06/22/2016 12:12:33 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....eI aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If he signed a bill then it had to come from congress. There is shared blame here.


16 posted on 06/22/2016 12:14:31 PM PDT by bubbacluck (America 180)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Unlike the old version, the new law allows the EPA to stop a potentially dangerous chemical from going to market.

Like lead and gunpowder?

17 posted on 06/22/2016 12:14:40 PM PDT by GregoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch
Dihydrogen monoxide

Yikes, that's dangerous stuff... and it's everywhere.
18 posted on 06/22/2016 12:15:46 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vsEPAwarrior
I think Rush has repeatedly pointed out is that the way to kill these bureaucracies is to de-fund, de-fund, de-fund.

It seems that more and more that is not an option. Even if this weak and compliant congress could be coerced to cut funds, someone would sue and the courts would say it's illegal to do so. It's absurd, of course, but that's where we are. Look at the efforts to cut funding to planned parenthood.

19 posted on 06/22/2016 12:16:21 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Here’s the list:

Tobacco = BAD

Marijuana = GOOD

/sarc


20 posted on 06/22/2016 12:18:21 PM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson