This last sentence is contrary to the last sentence in the excerpt. I don’t get it....
“”Robert Muise, co-founder and senior counsel of AFLC, added, This ruling is a significant victory. Not only does it reinstate our claims against CAIR, but it makes plain that we have an incredibly strong case to present to a jury. In short, CAIR has no way out. It is a fraudulent organization, and we will get a chance to prove that to a jury.””
“”Immediately, the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) and the Law Offices of David Yerushalmi appealed, asking the D.C. Circuit to reverse Judge Friedman and reinstate the plaintiffs claims against CAIR.””
Sorry - couldn’t get the two contrary sentences in the same reply....