Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brock Turner trial judge removed from new sexual assault case
The Washington Times ^ | June 14, 2015 | AP

Posted on 06/14/2016 5:42:03 PM PDT by jazusamo

PALO ALTO, Calif. — A Northern California prosecutor has removed the judge targeted for recall because of his handling of a campus sexual assault case from hearing a new sexual abuse case.

Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen on Tuesday removed Judge Aaron Persky from presiding over a hearing to determine if a former nurse should stand trial on charges of sexually abusing...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: brockturner; california; judgepersky; paloalto; sexassaultcase
Good for this prosecutor, judge Persky should retire at the very least.
1 posted on 06/14/2016 5:42:03 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

How does a DA have the power to remove a judge?


2 posted on 06/14/2016 5:48:14 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Certified Islamophobe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Reprehensible Judge but we all should be worried if the government is deciding on the judge for cases. That’s not how this works.


3 posted on 06/14/2016 5:48:42 PM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

Not sure, but it’s not like they weren’t showing a certain far-left bias the first time around.


4 posted on 06/14/2016 5:53:52 PM PDT by setha (It is past time for the United States to take back what the world took away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

I was wondering the same thing. Great question, I’d be surprised if it really works like that.


5 posted on 06/14/2016 5:54:06 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

I don’t know but I’d imagine the outrage and the move to recall this judge because of a similar case and the fiasco of his sentence had something to do with it.


6 posted on 06/14/2016 5:57:56 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

This is crap.

Even in a screwed up laughingstock place like Santa Clara County, the DA doesn’t have any such power.

At best he requested this and the presiding Judge granted the change.


7 posted on 06/14/2016 5:58:35 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4; major-pelham; setha; FreedomPoster; Regulator

Another article with more info:

http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_30015499/brock-turner-da-gets-judge-kicked-off-newhttp://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_30015499/brock-turner-da-gets-judge-kicked-off-new


8 posted on 06/14/2016 6:27:06 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham

Aparrently it does - peremptory challenge was made


9 posted on 06/14/2016 6:39:56 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

Recusal


10 posted on 06/14/2016 7:14:38 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

The prosecutor did not “remove” the judge, and did not “recuse” the judge. The prosecutor probably filed a motion (a single sheet of paper about a paragraph long) under Code of Civil Procedure Section 170.6 (no cause needed) and “disqualified” the judge. You can do it once per case.


11 posted on 06/14/2016 8:01:26 PM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Ok, there’s due process then. The first article in the original post made it sound as if the DA got to pick the judge, not ask another Judge to take him off. I’m down with this now.


12 posted on 06/15/2016 6:33:58 AM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Flash Bazbeaux

Do both sides have that right?


13 posted on 06/15/2016 12:25:09 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Yes. I was actually going to point out that the statute I cited CCP Section 170.6 was under civil procedure, not criminal procedure, which made me question whether it would apply in a criminal trial, but by its own language it applies to both.

Each side gets one free shot.


14 posted on 06/15/2016 12:48:01 PM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson