REally?
Let’s see I’ve posted serious thoughts on Newt, Rick Perry and Condi Rice? Why are these horrid picks?
I like Jeff Sessions, Chris Christie and even Rand Paul.
Why are those horrid?
I already explained to you why Newt and La Raza Rick were crap picks. Condi was a mediocre Sec of State and has the stench of Bush’s failed foreign policies all over her. She has no natural constituency, a social leftist, is VERY poor on Israel, and the media would have a field day with her personal life.
Sessions is the only one that should be considered of those you have named.
No Rand. Christie or Sessions OK
“Let’s see I’ve posted serious thoughts on Newt, Rick Perry and Condi Rice? Why are these horrid pick?”
Quick answer, because some people just like to be critical of every opposing view and writhe in misery. They take great solace in questioning for the sake of questioning unless it is “their pick”
I took notice the ever expected response of list any and all accomplishments garbage made its way to this post. That one is to be expected. Forget the fact her accomplishments are significantly more than you, I or anyone else presently posting. I’m convinced misery breeds company
Sessions and to some degree Newt are the only actual conservatives you’ve listed.
I think Trump would be happiest with Sessions—and he’s probably the best of those he’s actually considering.
Condi is a name to float if a black and a woman need to be floated.
But Christie and Condi and Paul aren’t conservative.
I like Jeff Sessions, Chris Christie and even Rand Paul.
Why are those horrid?
Nikos, I like those picks. Sessions would be my dream ticket. Christie is acceptable. I like Paul but I think his father poisons that alliance. We have got to do better than Perry or Condi.