Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; NFHale; ExTexasRedhead; GeronL

If elected to the Senate, Kamala Harris would be on the road to the White House; if elected to the Senate, Loretta Sanchez would never be able to go any further. Just for that, I’d vote for Sanchez (and then take a long shower).


18 posted on 06/11/2016 9:50:25 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: AuH2ORepublican
>> if elected to the Senate, Loretta Sanchez would never be able to go any further. <<

I wouldn't be so sure about that. As another poster noted, Sanchez is ambitious and has a national network of supporters. The RATs would LOVE to put a Latina on a presidential ticket and pat themselves on the back for "making history", and she's be one of the only prominent ones available.

The demographic trends of California favor Sanchez, but the hard-left Dem base is more likely to back Harris.

41 posted on 06/11/2016 10:37:34 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson