To: yoe
Of course, but that would have exposed the administration’s weapons trafficking to Syrian rebels through Benghazi.
8 posted on
06/10/2016 2:32:24 PM PDT by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: Telepathic Intruder; All
You know, satellite video & SatPhone could have helped direct missile strikes. Furthermore, with the one guy lasing the target on the roof until he died, the coordinates would have been known. Again, launch a missile. It works on all those strikes 0bama launches.
24 posted on
06/10/2016 3:19:28 PM PDT by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
To: Telepathic Intruder
no..the weapons trafficking was separate.....thats a false flag rumor that could be lived with... the real plan was to have the AMB kidnapped and traded for Gitmo guys just before the election...When the CIA men disobeyed the stand down orders and fought back the captors thought it was a double-cross so they killed the AMB......Hence the administration had to use traitor Beau Bergdahl to fulfill their part of the deal or the terrorist would have spilled the beans....Do your own research..its the only explanation that makes sense from all of the hearings.....Nobody knew why extra requested security was denied several times BEFORE the attack...it was to make sure it was a “clean” kidnapping...Woods and Doherty and 10 or more others screwed it up by going against orders and trying to resuce Stevens..
33 posted on
06/10/2016 4:45:45 PM PDT by
M-cubed
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson