Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
It's actually quite simple. Far less complex than a voting machine. If one is hacked (has been shown numerous times) hundreds of votes can be changed. Worse than that, if the machine design is compromised then all the votes are at stake. None of the internals are public.

In contrast all of the internals of the block chain software and the block chain itself is completely public. It can easily be audit and vote fraud can be investigated. We can agree that tech is never a silver bullet but some tech is clearly superior than other tech.

35 posted on 06/11/2016 7:56:42 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: palmer

Fewer hacking points than voting machines. Once you screw with the voter rolls/ linkage MILLIONS of votes can be changed.

The block chain itself is besides the point. The whole design is flawed to the point of uselessness. I’ve explained it multiple times, you refuse to acknowledged the painfully obvious flaws. It’s a terrible system, much much worse than what we have today. The block chain system will allow 1 hacker to dictate the ENTIRE national election. Sorry you can’t see that.


36 posted on 06/11/2016 8:06:26 AM PDT by discostu (Joan Crawford has risen from the grave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson