Posted on 06/08/2016 8:58:00 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
Professional Republicans in the #NeverTrump movement continue to oppose the presumptive nominee selected by the GOP electorate and are now floating strategies to throw the election to Hillary Clinton.
However, an examination of Clinton’s campaign promises reveals that Republicans who are willing to thwart Trump in favor of Clinton will be complicit in electing a President who would seek to bring about the complete and, possibly irreversible, dissolution of our nation’s borders.
A review of Clinton’s stated positions on the issue suggests she is perhaps the most extreme candidate on immigration ever to run for the office of the U.S. Presidency. Her views place her even further outside the mainstream of the American electorate than President Barack Obama, who systematically dismantled U.S. immigration law during his two terms in office.
Below are just a few of the extreme immigration positions held by Clinton.
(1) Expanding Unconstitutional Executive Amnesty
(2) Amnesty Within 100 Days
(3) Freezing deportations
(4) There’s no need to secure the border because it’s already “the most secure border we’ve ever had”
(5) Closing Detention Centers
(6) Obamacare for illegal aliens
(7) Full path to citizenship
(8) Expanded refugee resettlement
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Breitbart is too much like world net daily.
1) no amnesty now
2) no amnesty later
3) deport now
4) build wall
5) close detention centers after emptying them in mass deportation
6) repeal with no replace
7) exclude illegal aliens from future naturalization
8) only Christian refugees
Julia Hahn is a national treasure when it comes to the immigration issue. She is the best journalist out there on this issue. She knows and gets it.
Democrats would like to annex the entire voting population of Mexico and Central America to vote in American elections.
They will do it too, if only by bringing the a substantial fraction of that population here, with freebie incentives and an open border.
Well, her protestors want to make the United States Mexico. So I’m guessing she wants San Francisco to look like Tijuana in a few years.
AVAILABLE SOON FREE IN DUMPSTERS EVERYWHERE!
Below are just a few of the extreme immigration positions held by Clinton.
Ergo these are the positions of the tantruming never Trumpers and loser Cruzers who will not support Trump. How principled and conservative of them.
Somebody should produced a sarcastic GOP “platform” with never Trump enabled Clinton policies. That would be a hoot.
This is the ultimate completion of a process that we have labelled Surrender By Subterfuge.
Clearly, the issue here is the future. Dare we not elect Trump?!!
well, the constitution hasn’t meant anything to the DC establishment pukes for years. When the hag erases the borders, like GW Bush tried to do by secretly ushering in the North American Union, the country of the United States of America will be gone forever. With respect to eliminated the US, the NWO pukes will not quit until they either get their way or they meet their maker. It is up to the US people to decide which.
What border? The border effectively doesn’t exist now. DHS is picking up border jumpers and giving them rides in vans to the interior of the U.S.
Fixed it for ya.
I can't even view the Breitbart site any more, it's so jam-packed with crap, ads, overlays, Flash BS. It hangs the browser on my tablet.
That site is as dead to me now as its originator, sorry to say.
..and people were surprised when 0dunga focused so heavily on health care early in his presidency. He KNEW he was about to destroy jobs and throw millions into poverty. When are people going to wake up and see what has happened and that FELON HILLARY will finish this attack on America?
This is the dissolution of U.S. Sovereignty.
Trump needs to clearly define what this means.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.