Posted on 06/07/2016 6:23:28 AM PDT by detective
Truncated title.
Full title: State Department official's lawyer repeatedly objects to questions on Clinton's email during deposition
A lawyer for a top State Department official repeatedly objected to questions about Hillary Clinton's private email address during a deposition earlier this month.
The transcript, released on Monday by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, documented June 3 testimony from Ambassador Stephen D. Mull. The ambassador previously served as executive secretary of the State Department during Clinton's tenure.
"When did you first become aware of Mrs. Clinton — the email address Mrs. Clinton was using to conduct official government business?" asked Michael Bekesha, lawyer for Judicial Watch during the deposition.
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
So they received emails from people who they didn’t know who they were from ... and presumably answered emails back to people who they didn’t know who they communicating with?
I guess that could be true. We don’t definitively know that the person sending us an email is who they say they are, or who we think they are .... but it’s a hell of a way to run a State Department.
Either way it looks bad. You’re a top level State Departement official responding to an email which *might be* from H Clinton, you’re not sure, or you really didn’t give any thought who it came from, you just assume it came from Clinton ...? That’s basically what the guy being deposed is saying.
They are hiding some MAJOR crimes in my opinion. Trump needs to ask everyday what they are hiding.
And why are they protecting Hillary.
Trump already said pretty clearly, “Hillary is going to jail!”. He got my vote right there.
The link doesn’t go to the article...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.