“The sanctions ordered by the Court far exceed the bounds of appropriate remedies for what this Court concluded were intentional misrepresentations, a conclusion that was reached without proper procedural protections and that lacks sufficient evidentiary support,” DOJ attorneys wrote their motion for the stay. Did these slimeballs even read that judge's reasoning -- because there was pleanty of evidentiary support; in fact, given the conspiracy uncovered to lie to the court [repeatedly] it stands to reason that a criminal investigation into the matter ought to be held.