Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Good for Trump!
1 posted on 05/26/2016 1:27:35 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Innovative

Trump should have asked for $100 million. Any one of the cable news outfits would have paid.


2 posted on 05/26/2016 1:30:38 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Trump is being fair here

100 million, they won’t touch it

10 million, who knows

smart move either way


3 posted on 05/26/2016 1:33:25 PM PDT by arl295
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Sanders doesn’t have $10M.

Makes Trump look like he didn’t mean it, doesn’t really want to do it.

Sorry, it does.


4 posted on 05/26/2016 1:34:12 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I’d personally pay a nice chunk of change to see that!


5 posted on 05/26/2016 1:36:07 PM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

That’s what we’re in for.

A Summer filled with PT Barnum shows to keep Hillary off-balance, discombobulated, and on defense.

Welcome to the Thunderdome, Hillary.


6 posted on 05/26/2016 1:36:30 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
If you all remember, Jimmy Carter refused to debate John Anderson and sat on the sidelines while Ronald Reagan debated him instead.

Didn't work out too well for Jimmy Carter.

11 posted on 05/26/2016 1:44:05 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Delegates So Far: Trump (1,238); Cruz (559); Rubio (165); Kasich (161)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I see some articles saying no, Donald was just joking about debating Bernie. I see others saying Donald is ‘looking forward’ to debating Bernie.

I don’t know what to conclude, except that Donald has once again found a way to create a meaty story that must be discussed. Donald is done with Megyn for now. We know enough about her by now. Trump has created a market for this event that did not exist before today, and he’s done so without spending any money on ads. PRICELESS!!$


13 posted on 05/26/2016 1:45:48 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

charity? sounds good....

Hillary’d demand $100,000,000.00 for HERSELF!


18 posted on 05/26/2016 1:51:43 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

It seems clear to me that Trump is trying to rip away Bernie supporters from Hillary in the general election. Look for the debate to be fairly respectful as compared with most of the Republican primary debates, because he does not need to “Get rid” of Bernie. Bernie is just a convenient tool.

I am reminded of Samson destroying the Philistines using the jawbone of an ass. (Judges 15:16)

Hillary is probably having a triple shot of vodka right now, cussing out the Secret Service and throwing ashtrays.

Trump’s strategy also sucks the media oxygen away from Big Mouth Pocahontas.


22 posted on 05/26/2016 1:54:29 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
If this does happen think about what it does to Hillary's chances in California.

Also $10 million is a starting price. If someone wants to put in a higher offer who would turn it down.

23 posted on 05/26/2016 1:54:37 PM PDT by McGruff (What about #NeverHillary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

$10 million to sponsor a “Trump vs Bernie” debate would be worth ten times that in publicity and goodwill for any company willing to come forward.


31 posted on 05/26/2016 1:59:27 PM PDT by pleasenotcalifornia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Oh what a decision for the poor MSM:

1) We pay $10m to watch The Donald go after The Bern in a cage match, and we make $100M

2) We don’t, so both contestants don’t get to trash Hillary! on prime time TV, and we make $0


32 posted on 05/26/2016 1:59:28 PM PDT by freedomlover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Bernie has never seen that kind of personal money....


34 posted on 05/26/2016 2:04:04 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I really hope this occurs. What a stick in Clinton’s eye.


43 posted on 05/26/2016 2:15:14 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Like herpes, Cruz can always flare up again. Treat with Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Trump needs to increase his voter base. Playing stupid games with Bernie ain’t gonna cut it. He’s got the Reality TV voters locked in time to move on.


46 posted on 05/26/2016 2:18:48 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Can hardly wait until 2017 when he faces Putin, Khomeni, Kim Jung-un, and others.

Reminds me of the checkmate move Ronald Reagan made with the announcement of the "Star Wars" SDI missle defense program.

52 posted on 05/26/2016 2:45:41 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Have the Veterans been given what was promised at the Charity rally a while back? I think I saw a report that they were still waiting. Trump should make sure this is resolved, before any talk of another “charity” event is scheduled. I don’t want to give any opposing forces any ammunition. Go Trump.


56 posted on 05/26/2016 2:57:43 PM PDT by Mark was here (Isn't attacking Trump's ex-girlfriends a "war on women"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

“Sanders’ July 2015 personal filing lists assets valued at between $194,026 and $741,000 in his wife Jane Sanders’ name — with the majority of these assets held in investment funds. The filing also lists credit card debt between $25,002 and $65,000.

The personal asset disclosure forms do not list properties held by Bernie and Jane Sanders, which include a home in the Washington D.C. neighborhood of Capitol Hill where the median home price is roughly $726,000 and a home in Vermont that realtor.com values at approximately $320,000.

The campaign asset disclosure does not include the Sanders household’s 2015 after tax income — which would have been in the neighborhood of $180,000 assuming it were similar to the family’s tax filing in 2014.

Adding the estimated values of the Sanders family’s homes in Vermont and Washington D.C. to the median value of the asset estimate listed in his campaign personal asset filing and an after-tax estimate of the Sanders household’s 2015 income suggests that Bernie and Jane Sanders hold assets valued at roughly $1.7 million. Subtracting the median of the candidate’s listed credit card debt range suggests that the couple holds somewhere in the neighborhood of $1.65 million in assets, assuming both houses are owned outright.—The Motley Fool


59 posted on 05/26/2016 3:10:35 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson