Posted on 05/24/2016 1:03:06 PM PDT by Lorianne
The SEC showed its true colors yet again at a panel at Stanford Law School at the end of March, although not as dramatically as last year. In last springs SEC panel at Stanford, the then head of examinations, Andrew Bowden, made such fawning remarks about private equity, including repeatedly saying hed really like his son to work in the industry, that he resigned three weeks after we publicized the segment. Nevertheless, this conference was another demonstration of depth of regulatory capture at the agency.
As before, the real action came in when the audience members asked questions. They were all fielded by Andrew Ceresney, a former Debevoise & Plympton partner, now head of enforcement. Were going to look at two questions in succession.
This one, the second in the Q&A section, has an individual investor reiterating objections that Elizabeth Warren, as well as SEC commissioners Kara Stein and Luis Aguilar, made about the SECs practice of being far too willing to waive an automatic sanction, that of the loss of well known security issuer status for serious violators. Kara Steins stinging 2015 dissent to a Deutsche Bank waiver gives a flavor for how the SEC is all too willing to go easy in the face of criminality:
(Excerpt) Read more at nakedcapitalism.com ...
Damn. I thought this was an SEC football conference thread.
HAHAHA!!! Seriously, I was thinking, fraudster? Must be about Urban Meyer.
Or Muschump.
Me too
This is not necessary since Cam Newton’s career is looking good right now.
>>Cam Newtons career is looking good right
Not quite as good as it was looking on Feb. 6th.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.