She’s crooked. There, I explained it, your welcome everybody.
Damaged goods, Past the Due Date.
Smells bad too.
No leadership skills because she has lived off government.
Let’s see.. Republicans uniformly hate her... Sane-thinking moderates don’t want that crook anywhere near the White House.
She’s a liar. A criminal. And too much Bern is being felt by millennials.
Does that answer the answer as to why? I am sure the NY Slimes has differing rational to placate the masses.
They ran a fake no-name candidate against her, to make it look like she was in a real campaign...
and the fake no-name candidate is winning. That tells you all you need to know about how popular she is among Dems.
Because of the nature of the Clinton Machine, no one dares to oppose her openly. But they vote with their feet and their cheers for the guy they propped up there to make it look like a real opponent.
She will win the nomination, because it was pre-ordained that she would. To beat Trump, though, will require major felonies.
This sounds more like a pep talk rather than anew article. They are still trying to keep Hillary in the lead and convince themselves victory will be easy as she rallies the Bernie people behind her candidacy.
She’d probably be in better shape if she hadn’t been SOS.....cuz she’s DOA.
Another great article about Hilly’s campaign troubles .... Hanson has his linguistic scalpel out & “fillets” her:
Hillary’s Sputtering Campaign [Victor David Hanson]
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/435744/hillarys-sputtering-campaign
Mr. Sanders himself....seems unlikely.
The Fake Indian.....well, Hil would have to backtrack on just about everything she’s promised Wall Street. They might demand a refund of their speaking fees.
Obama? Well she appears to have already sold her soul to him.
Bill could not get 50%, and he was the popular one...
“Explaining Hillary Clinton’s Lost Ground in the Polls”
it’s just bad luck: it’s a blip and she’ll bounce back, right NYT?
Please oh please... can the New York Times highlight their bias and hatred of traditional Americans just one MORE TIME? That works for US and against the Clintons.
Shameful bias helps bump Trump's numbers up... and pushes Clinton's down. Too much love from indulgent parents for their bratty child... doesn't make the kid popular.
Hey New York Times Editors... Can WE play you too?
One of the things that 'happened' Nate Cohn is the NEW YORK TIMES ran a biased hate piece against Trump while ignoring CRIMINAL accusations against the Clintons...AND THE PEOPLE NOTICED. You guys aren't gatekeepers anymore.. we have other new sources for news... places that aren't biased and hateful... That's what's hurting Clinton... your creepy indulgence...
BTW, the comments at the NYT about this article are very educational. The overwhelming sentiment is anti-Clinton, though clearly most of those commenting are Democrats/”Progressvies”.
Try “Crooked Hillary.” Since Trump began using that, she has plummeted.
The primaries were a long time ago but I mostly recall the Republican candidates attacking each other, not Hillary.
Now that's putting lipstick on a pig.