Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1
You mean like when Reagan imposed a 35% tariff on Japanese motorcycle imports that saved Harley Davidson?

You were extremely upset with Reagan then I suppose.

4 posted on 05/23/2016 2:22:40 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Robert DeLong

Saved Harley Davidson at the expense of everyone who wished to purchase something other than Harley Davidson. But that’s the point of most taxes on imports. To protect favored businesses at the expense of other business.

So Harley wasn’t worth a 35% premium over Jap bikes back then was it? So why didn’t all the Harley fans just voluntarily suck it up and pay 35% more and let the rest of America enjoy cheap Jap bikes.

Of course Harley used those profits wisely by investing in overseas parts suppliers. So its a great idea to force the purchase of Harley bikes but Harley should not be forced to buy American? http://nypost.com/2014/07/22/harley-shares-fall-after-admitting-foreign-parts-hold-up-new-bikes/


5 posted on 05/23/2016 2:53:07 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Robert DeLong
There is a difference between:

tariffs imposed when foreign manufacturers dump products at less than their cost of production (which I support) and:

tariffs imposed because a foreign manufacturer's actual cast of production is less than that of over-taxed, over-regulated, unionized, Obamacare'd, American manufacturers. I completely oppose tariffs in that case - we should take the burden off the American manufacturer by cutting the taxes and regulations.

11 posted on 05/29/2016 7:23:31 AM PDT by David G. Hall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson