Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Biggirl

Airbus Industries, the American, Egyptian & French governments know exactly what caused the crash of the Egypt Air Airbus A320 aircraft. Direct information from the aircraft’s “ACARS” information system point to an explosion in the cockpit or foward left hand lavatory with resulting failure of the computor system that cpontrols the flight of the aircraft.

The smoke in the the cockpit/lavatroy & window heat failures points to the blow out of a sliding window in the cockpit and the destruction of the below cockpit E&E electrical, Avionics and flight control computor systems. Either someone got into the cocpit and set off the bomb device or, more likely the pilot or co-pilot or, both them set of the fatal terrorist device!!!

The reason no one has claimed credit for this massacre of innocents is because, this incident is most likely the terrorist handiwork of the Obama/Clinton beloved, Muslim Brotherhood/ISIS. End of story!!!

Go Donald J. Trump!!! America and the entire world needs you as the one true leader of the free world!!! Americans, wake up!!! The tru enemy is inside the gates of the USA....Obama, Clinton, the entire Democrat Party!!!


4 posted on 05/23/2016 4:48:00 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (Defeat both the Republican (e) & Democrat (e) political parties....Forever!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JLAGRAYFOX

It does seem strange that no one has claimed credit, but that could be a new MO. Keep ‘em guessing.


5 posted on 05/23/2016 4:53:17 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX
It's like with the flight that went down in Long Island Sound. The worst kind of terrorism is when no one takes credit or it can't be determined what the cause is. It's much easier to rally around and solve the problem when it's known what the problem is.

For those reasons, it only makes sense to assume terrorism unless it's proven that it isn't. It keeps everyone focused on the primary problem civilization faces.

11 posted on 05/23/2016 4:57:39 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

Ummm... no, the codes do not indicate a blowout of the window. Not at all - a window blowout would have been accompanied by a long list of pressurization loss error codes and it wasn’t. I posted this in one of the other threads:

***

Doesn’t work with the ACARS reporting timeline - fire was first detected inside the bulkhead under/around the right front windows. Check the timeline (I’ve annotated it):

00:26Z 3044 ANTI ICE R WINDOW - right forward cockpit window anti-ice sensor has detected elevated temperatures when the computer wasn’t expecting to see them.
00:26Z 561200 R SLIDING WINDOW SENSOR - right side cockpit window sensor has detected elevated temperatures when the computer was not expecting to see them.
00:26Z 2600 SMOKE LAVATORY SMOKE - Smoke detected in the lavatory. The front lav on an A320 is one the *left* side of the aircraft. It shares the back wall of the cockpit on the left side.
00:27Z 2600 AVIONICS SMOKE - Smoke detected in the avionics bay which IIRC is under the floor of the cockpit.
00:28Z 561100 R FIXED WINDOW SENSOR - right side cockpit window sensor has detected elevated temperatures when the computer was not expecting to see them.
00:29Z 2200 AUTO FLT FCU 2 FAULT - Autopilot module 2 has failed, probably due to fire given prior messages.
00:29Z 2700 F/CTL SEC 3 FAULT - Part of main flight controls has failed, probably due to fire given prior messages.

This reads like an underfloor fire.

***

Note the time between the codes - three *minutes* between first heat alarm and loss of one of the flight control systems. There are no in-cockpit codes, so this fire was not actually in the cockpit. The smoke was wafting its way up from the bottom of the fuselage and getting out by any way it could - first through the lavatory plumbing and electrical passthroughs then getting into the avionics bay after the (presumed) fire had breached its containment.

This does *not* rule out terrorism, but it does rule out in-flight participation by anyone on board. The areas where an incendiary could cause these areas and no others are *not* accessible in flight. Nor is the forward baggage compartment far enough forward for a device in the luggage to be the likely cause. If it was terrorism, it was an incendiary placed in the nose or in the fuselage under the cockpit area by someone on the ground. It is, however, more likely that this is another SwissAir Flight 111 incident where faulty electronics or wiring caused a fire. Remember, this is a FRENCH built plane.


13 posted on 05/23/2016 4:59:38 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

amen


31 posted on 06/17/2016 4:59:00 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson