The trend is your friend.
when the RNC and SOB like Romney stopped funding endless negative commercials Trump could start to have his personal characteristics start to help him with his negatives.
I know Hillary has a 100 million dollar buy of negative stuff, but , I think that the public is inoculated bad news.
Investors know when bad stuff is priced into a stock’s evaluation. Too bad the sages of the media elite don’t get this concept.
Trump can never be worse with women than Clinton. I hope the Beauty contestants come out to talk about the upside of how pageants helped them go thru college and get into businesses.
I hope the stories about how Clinton underpaid women vs. Trump parity of salaries and opportunities. Trump made progress on the “glass ceiling” and WHERE WAS HILLARY. Next time you speak to the campaign mention these facts, few people have been informed about.
Also, stories like the Ed MC Mahon story , Tell them, Trump did good while not taking credit, without people knowing. The Clinton foundation, how much percentage wise ever does good, I bet its shockingly low.
Clinton Foundation is a slush fund. Trump has a checkbook, he sees where he can do some good and help out folks, and he writes a check. Trump has zero overhead and 100% of his giving goes to the people who need help.
The Clintons start with making sure you know they have a foundation, get max publicity, and we don’t know how much of the pie actually reaches those who they help.
I think this is one area where the Trump campaign has done a poor job in comparing and contrasting his generosity vs. the Clinton Greed and Deception.