1 posted on
05/16/2016 11:22:42 AM PDT by
Maceman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: Maceman
2 posted on
05/16/2016 11:23:32 AM PDT by
Ray76
(Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
To: Maceman
3 posted on
05/16/2016 11:24:30 AM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
To: Maceman
I really like Palin, but she comes with way too much baggage. I hope she’s not on the short list.
To: Maceman
I’m betting Trump is just floating that name to make the libs go ape sh*t...
To: Maceman
6 posted on
05/16/2016 11:24:49 AM PDT by
gaijin
To: Maceman
To: Maceman
If the media hates her its a SELLING POINT.
8 posted on
05/16/2016 11:25:52 AM PDT by
gaijin
To: Maceman
Why not? She’s as good as many and better than most.
10 posted on
05/16/2016 11:26:03 AM PDT by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Maceman
If being done to help Bogart the news cycle and manipulate the media, no problem.
11 posted on
05/16/2016 11:26:18 AM PDT by
HombreSecreto
(The life of a repo man is always intense)
To: Maceman
I hope Sarah Palin
is on his VP short list.
I don't get the hysterical PDS™ of some conservatives.
It's like they've actually bought into the left wing smears against Sarah Palin, and are willing to let them dictate Trump's VP choice.
Vote Trump
13 posted on
05/16/2016 11:26:57 AM PDT by
sargon
(Continue with 24/7 anti-Trump diatribes & insults, your opus will be assumed.)
To: Maceman
There’s no possible way Trump would select Sarah Palin as VP but stating that she is a possibility is a sure way to dominate news cycles and get inside the heads of a lot of people.
14 posted on
05/16/2016 11:27:07 AM PDT by
SamAdams76
(Delegates So Far: Trump (1,135); Cruz (564); Rubio (166); Kasich (153)
To: Maceman
I think Sarah could add a lot to the campaign. But, the leftist press recognized her political potential and therefore they smeared her public image a lot. It is unfair, of course. But, would she still be a wise choice for Mr. Trump?
15 posted on
05/16/2016 11:27:56 AM PDT by
faithhopecharity
("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero)
To: Maceman
I doubt it. Palin is damaged goods
16 posted on
05/16/2016 11:28:02 AM PDT by
KosmicKitty
(Liberals claim to want to hear other views, but then are shocked to discover there are other views)
To: Maceman
Sarah’s husband was in a serious accident, and has a long recovery ahead of him. She might take herself out of consideration just due to this.
On the other hand, after the election, could Sarah be appointed to Trump’s cabinet, or a high level adviser???
To: Maceman
Doesn’t seem to fit his criteria . . . familiarity and ability to work with Congress.
To: Maceman
Yesterday, Carson was already trying to walk back his comments on the VP short list.
He said those were only examples of who might be on the list.
==
22 posted on
05/16/2016 11:35:32 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: Maceman
24 posted on
05/16/2016 11:35:46 AM PDT by
Java4Jay
(The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
To: Maceman
To: Maceman
I’m skeptical. She could bring much to any of several cabinet positions, but woould bring too many propaganda impediments as VP, and pull nothing in that Trump does not already have. I would LOVE to see her in a high profile and significant cabinet position, both to rehab her slandered record and to make enemies heads explode, Mitt Romney not least among them.
28 posted on
05/16/2016 11:37:03 AM PDT by
Psalm 144
(This year we break the Uniparty or it breaks us.)
To: Maceman
I hope not. Used to like her but no more. She is very polarizing.
29 posted on
05/16/2016 11:37:13 AM PDT by
BunnySlippers
(I Love Bull Markets!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
