Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
From a layman's viewpoint, the entire blasted law is unconstitutional, to wit:

1. Roe V. Wade (a decision from hell) stated in essence that citizens are entitled to strict PRIVACY especially in "health care" matters "between the patient and the doctor," the government mining of all our health data is a breach of said privacy.

2. "Equal Protection" clause states that all citizens are to be treated equally under the law -- ACA excludes certain individuals by group, e.g. The Amish, The Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branch, to name a few.

In 6 years (and the best is yet to come) MORE people are WITHOUT health care than when the law was passed.

Pffft.

6 posted on 05/12/2016 2:53:02 PM PDT by fone (Proverbs 109.8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fone

What the Fourteenth Amendment actually states is that “(n)o state shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” That certainly does not mean that laws are to be altered for the sake of a twisted definition of equality.

And of course, RvW cannot make private any plots to murder human beings, but that is what it does in its mangled language.


7 posted on 05/12/2016 3:04:15 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson