Skip to comments.
LGBT Lobbyists Demand ‘Purity of a Queer Relationship’ in ‘Frozen’ Sequel
NewsBusters.org ^
| May 8, 2016
| Melissa Mullins
Posted on 05/08/2016 7:52:29 AM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
1
posted on
05/08/2016 7:52:29 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
2
posted on
05/08/2016 7:53:45 AM PDT
by
null and void
("when authority began inspiring contempt, it had stopped being authority" ~ H. Beam Piper)
To: Kaslin
Fine, here's her butch, cat-lady girlfriend.
3
posted on
05/08/2016 7:54:01 AM PDT
by
struggle
(The)
To: Kaslin
Queers claim that they aren’t pedophiles.
This pretty much proves that they are.
4
posted on
05/08/2016 7:55:12 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Kaslin
Animated sodomy in a children’s movie? Delightful.
5
posted on
05/08/2016 7:55:58 AM PDT
by
Spok
("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
To: Kaslin
They should proceed with the Lesbian theme and when it fails, it should be front page news. And I hope that they lose tens of millions of dollars.
The failure has to be painful.
6
posted on
05/08/2016 7:56:54 AM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: Kaslin
But, but, but.....what about the pedophiles “rights”? I really, really don’t like this crap.
7
posted on
05/08/2016 7:57:32 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: Kaslin
Disney is already borderline for me - Their FreeForm channel (was ABC Family) already has shows with homosexual and lesbian relationships openly celebrated as well as blatantly placed transgender actors (tokens).
Marvel’s Agents of Shield has already introduced a gay character (but not currently in a relationship because that would be too inflammatory)
Let’s not even get into Oaken’s “family” being gay (or not but was probably intended that way)
IF they cross the line it’s time to shut them down completely and boycott all Disney products. (ABC, Marvel and ESPN)
8
posted on
05/08/2016 8:01:33 AM PDT
by
Skywise
To: Kaslin
So, less that 10% of a 3% population group is making more noise that 75% of the entire nation and they are controlling the culture.
There is much farther to fall.
9
posted on
05/08/2016 8:04:31 AM PDT
by
Baynative
(The people promising to raise taxes and support abortion are already rich and already born.)
To: null and void
Anybody else getting p...ed?
Not like there’s no paper towels left p...ed.
I mean like you mother @#@#$s better STFU and crawl back into your deviant holes while you can p...ed?
10
posted on
05/08/2016 8:07:01 AM PDT
by
dp0622
(The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
To: Baynative
And my wife wonders why I never want to go to movies anymore.
To: struggle
Disney,
We the LGBT community demand you make a kids movies that no parent will take their kids to.
To: Skywise
“...IF they cross the line ...”
Seems to me that line was crossed a while ago.
13
posted on
05/08/2016 8:12:39 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: Kaslin
When he shows a picture of his family to Anna it features another man in a sauna with his four children. When Disney was asked if Oaken was intended to be gay, they didnt confirm his sexual orientation, but hinted that they knew exactly what they were doing.
To: Kaslin
Darn it, I liked that movie
One would think that Disney would have better sense.
Once Upon a Time toyed with this, and failed with a thud.
15
posted on
05/08/2016 8:13:40 AM PDT
by
HangnJudge
(Cthulhu for President, why vote for a lesser Evil)
To: Kaslin
Shouldn’t kids movies be about friendship rather than sexual identity? Friggin lesbo pedophiles.
16
posted on
05/08/2016 8:14:06 AM PDT
by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
To: dhs12345
Who would let their kids SEE something like that?!?!? I mean, I know there are some freaks that would but, come’on. Most parents don’t want their kids to turn gay because they know it’s a short life full of misery.
17
posted on
05/08/2016 8:15:50 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Off the NWO)
To: null and void
“...weve never been able to see the purity in a queer relationship.”
Well, maybe because it is impure?
18
posted on
05/08/2016 8:20:05 AM PDT
by
heterosupremacist
("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." Thomas Jefferson)
To: Kaslin
...weve never been able to see the purity in a queer relationship.And nor have I, darling.
It's a nasty, perverted, against-nature and things good situation, and I for one will never see any purity at all in a queer relationship.
And thank you for labeling it correctly...it is, indeed, queer.
Now go crawl back in your hole and commiserate with #TrigglyPuff or whatever ignorant dumb ass SJW is out there.
19
posted on
05/08/2016 8:21:47 AM PDT
by
OldSmaj
(I am a Bible reading, gun-toting, Constitution loving, America-first, islam-hating CONSERVATIVE!)
To: Kaslin
20
posted on
05/08/2016 8:32:03 AM PDT
by
Stepan12
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson