Replies

It’s a cliche by now, but she and her party are less concerned about guns than in control. Guns are just the tipping point.

Here’s a how-the-dominoes-fall scenario, once the Democrats and their eager GOP stooges finally get their amnesty—and tens of millions of new voters for a NAU.

Firearms are the Bill of Rights firewall, so if she pulls our teeth, next she gets “hate speech” banned, like here on FR; IOW, anything her administration doesn’t like, after her Supreme Court reconsiders New York Times v. Sullivan and her justice department starts ginning-up criminal complaints.
Then freedom of association as well—as the Sanders-Clinton goons tried to do at Trump rallies. Ya know, too much violence by the rabble.
`Freedom of religion’ next, and then the right to freely travel between the states becomes a national security issue.
The “greater good” is served as well by probable cause for searches and seizures being redefined by her US Dept. of Justice, as set forth with her executive orders.

The 9th and 10 amendments are pretty much gone, as we see by the feds threatening North Carolina the other day because the Tarheels would rather not have perverts choosing which public restroom they use in public facilities which have chosen to not capitulate to DC’s diktat; and over the last few years, the southwestern states demanding the right to protect themselves from the ongoing invasion, since the feds won’t do it, and the feds filed suits to stop them.

They eat the independent e-press and what remains of the GOP last, once they stop following her `suggestions,’ always passed on through others.

Then we’re all safe and secure from the dangers of liberty in our Hillary Clinton just-another-3rd world banana republic.

Any conservative Pollyannas concerned about their ... integrity, quibbling over Trump v. Clinton, sulking in their tents like Achilles—they’re as crazy as peach orchard boars in high summer.