Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian

I believe that may be the “tar sands” region of Canada.

I’ll guess you can get one heck of a wildfire when the SOIL starts burning, too!


2 posted on 05/04/2016 9:14:14 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: zeestephen

Yes a large tar sands operations. I have a friend who was transferred to that area to work on the Shell operation.
Bad news since it’s a remote area.


4 posted on 05/04/2016 9:39:43 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: zeestephen
From what I understand of the 'oil sands'/'tar sands' mining process, the 'oil sands' run almost like 'seams' in the ground, as coal would. There is little, if any, that does not have 'overburden' atop the seam, so there is little chance of the ground catching fire. If something like that happened, I imagine it might be akin to an underground 'peat bog' fire, burning and smouldering for years unless it was dug up and extimguished.

Here is a diagram from the Imperial Oil (69.6% owned by ExxonMobil) website, detailing the process used at the 'Kearl' site:
Note the shovel digging the oil sand located under the overburden. The 'overburden' is removed and the 'oil sands' are mined and processed.

Historically, the Natives in the area, would use oil sands on the surface or seeping out of the banks of the Athabaska River, to waterproof their canoes. The 'easy stuff' is all gone.

5 posted on 05/04/2016 9:45:00 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson